Laserfiche WebLink
<br />September 25, 1989 Council Meeting - Page Two <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Vodonik asked that one of three things be considered: <br /> <br />1. Change the ordinance to allow 25' vehicles be stored, rather than 20', <br /> <br />2. Take unusual circumstances into account, i.e., aesthetic reasons for <br />allowing the vehicle, such as on wooded versus non-wooded property. <br /> <br />3, Develop a system to allow a variance of this particular ordinance from <br />Ordinance requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Vodonik asked for a six month extension, noting that his parents will <br />be leaving soon for a period of four months, but that he will be faced <br />with the storage problem again when they return. He understood from the <br />CSO that there had been no complaints received regarding storage of the RV <br />on the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hansen stated she would prefer ordinance enforcement, but <br />that the City should allow the vehicle to stay and ask the Clerk <br />Administrator to look at a possible ordinance change. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla noted that the Council could suspend the ordinance <br />regulations pending a staff review, but should direct staff to look into <br />this matter. Councilmember Malone noted he is not interested in amending <br />the ordinance at this time and asked the City Attorney if our ordinance is <br />unduly restrictive. Attorney Filla responded that he is of the opinion <br />that Arden Hills' ordinance is more liberal than other cities on this; <br />suggested staff double check with other communities before further action <br />is taken. Councilmember Growe agreed and felt that no RV vehicles need to <br />be moved until after the survey is completed. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator Berger noted that staff had been asked to follow-up on <br />ordinance enforcement and that he would report back in two weeks at the <br />October 10 Council meeting. <br /> <br />After discussion, Council directed the Community Service Officer to survey <br />other cities to see how they handle this matter and to report back to <br />Council October 10 with the survey results. Until that time, Mr. Vodonik <br />will be allowed to park his 25' recreational vehicle on his property in <br />its present location. <br /> <br />ASSMT. HEARINGS <br />DEL. UTILITIES <br /> <br />Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:49 P.M. for the <br />purpose of a public hearing to certify delinquent <br />utility accounts to the County Auditor. Administrator <br />Berger verified that the Notice of Hearing was published in the New <br />Brighton Bulletin on September 13 and mailed to affected property owners <br />on September 12, 1989. Staff noted that one payment for the delinquent <br />utility account had been received since the packet was mailed, thus an <br />additional name should be deleted from the assessment roll. <br /> <br />Mayor Sather asked for questions or comments from the public. There being <br />none, he closed the public hearing at 7:50 P,M. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved, seconded by Councilmember Growe, to adopt <br />Resolution No. 89-44A, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING SPECIAL <br />ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT SEWER AND WATER ACCOUNTS". Motion carried <br />unanimously, (4-0). <br />