11-05-25 PC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 4 of 7 1. Site Data All subject properties are zoned R-1 – Single Family Residential District and are guided as Low Density Residential (LDR) in the 2040 Land Use Plan. Surrounding parcels to the north, east, and west are also zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District and designated for Low Density Residential Uses in the Future Land Use Plan. 2040 Future Land Use Plan: LDR – Low Density Residential Existing Land Use: Single-Family Dwelling Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential District Lot Size: 1613 Lake Johanna Blvd (Subject Property A): 16,452 SF 1580 Oak Avenue (Subject Property B): 65,481 SF 1578 Oak Avenue (Subject Property C): 216,788 SF 2. Approvals The Planning Commission is asked to determine whether a minor subdivision request should be granted. The evaluation of the proposal should be based on the requirements of Chapter 11 – Subdivisions and Chapter 13 – Zoning Code, District Provisions in Section 1320. The applicable requirements and evaluations of the proposed subdivision are addressed in the next section. Plan Evaluation Chapter 11, Subdivisions Regulations Review 1. 1150.04 Division or Consolidation of Platted Lots of Record The application is to divide one or more existing platted lots designated in a subdivision plat on file and of record in the office of the recorder or registrar of titles for the county, into one or more separately described parcels. While the minor subdivision request does not create new lots, the request further divides the subject properties. The Application is subject to compliance with the conditions for Survey, Relation to Zoning Ordinance, Public Welfare, Conformity, and Filing Fee. The application meets the requirements for these conditions except Conformity, which requires that the proposed division shall conform to such other requirements in the Subdivision chapter of the City Code. The proposed adjustments do not bring Subject Property B into full conformance with the Subdivision code as it relates to lot location on a public street, however considering the lot split alone, the proposal does not increase any nonconformity beyond the existing nonconformities of Subject Properties B and C. Location - Nonconforming All lots are required to abut by their full frontage on a public street. Subject Property C has frontage on Oak Avenue and Lake Johanna Boulevard and would be considered a corner lot with the front lot line being along Oak Avenue. The existing Subject Property A does not have any frontage on a public street and is accessible by a driveway easement from Lake Johanna Blvd. The Applicant’s request would not change this, nor would it create another lot that would not have full frontage on a public street. Subject Property B has frontage on Lake Johanna Blvd but the property does not have direct access to this roadway and the front building line of the principal structure is oriented toward Oak Avenue.