Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 5, 2025 6 <br /> <br />3) All signage shall meet all other requirements of Sign District 5. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Collins opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Burlingame asked if staff believed there were any physical or topographical <br />conditions that make the existing signs not visible from the adjoining streets. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen stated the topography of the land was fairly flat but noted this was a <br />large building and the current layout of the building on the site makes it difficult to see the <br />signage from the other elevations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Julius inquired if the sign illumination would adversely impact the neighboring <br />properties or adjacent residents. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen commented she did not believe the proposed sign would impact the <br />adjacent businesses or property owners, as the current sign was not causing any concerns. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lindau reported both Walgreens and The Tavern exceed the City’s sign code <br />standards. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund stated this business had frontage on Lexington Avenue and no <br />signage along Lexington Avenue. He believed this was a hardship for the business and should be <br />considered a Finding of Fact. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobson agreed with Commissioner Bjorklund’s statement. She asked if the <br />new sign would be twice as big as the existing sign. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen stated this would be the case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobson noted this property does not have any monument signs and indicated <br />she could support the addition of one more sign on the wall face for this building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund commented on how the proposed wall sign was proportional for the <br />building elevation. <br /> <br />Chair Collins requested the applicant come forward at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobson asked if the second sign would be double the size of the existing wall <br />sign. <br />