My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-25-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
10-27-25-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2025 12:58:01 PM
Creation date
12/3/2025 12:57:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – OCTOBER 27, 2025 14 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said it is important to gain an understanding of what is available. It is difficult to <br />offer a density bonus without locations to build density. It doesn’t make sense to talk about things <br />that we can’t do. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden thought there was a list of things other than density bonuses. She would <br />like to see all of the affordable housing options so Council can choose what is best for Arden <br />Hills. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber said regardless of what else we do, having density bonuses gives teeth to <br />the action. It’s not something we are required to do. To not do something because we know it’s <br />not an option now is incredibly short-sighted. There are a lot of tax-exempt lots that could be <br />available in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson would like density bonuses to be included. She would like to better <br />understand the structure. Developers are opportunistic. They will find the land. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly summarized that we need an evaluation of un-utilized <br />land and where things might go, if the market allows. Then once we know that, we want to have a <br />menu of things to choose from, including density bonuses, reduction in park dedication fees or <br />park requirements. That will give us tools to get the best development possible and have it not <br />seem arbitrary. <br /> <br />C. Lake Johanna Fire Department Strategic Plan Follow-Up Discussion <br /> <br />City Administrator Jagoe said this is a follow up to the presentation the Lake Johanna Fire <br />Department (LJFD) made at the last work session. The fire department provided some <br />supplemental information based on the Council feedback at that discussion. They shared response <br />times for calls when Station 1 is browned out. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding how many calls were being tracked. Is it a high or an average? The <br />longest responses were the most extreme cases and the smallest percentage. The numbers <br />accounting for the median and the mean calls was more useful information. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said she didn’t think they provided a lot of the information that <br />Councilmember Monson requested. She was disappointed with that. She said chances are this will <br />pass. She wanted Council direction if Arden Hills should vote in favor or not. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson asked what Councilmember Holden’s message has been so far with <br />discussions at the Fire Board. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said her answer has been no, she wouldn’t vote for it. It’s an <br />astronomical amount of money. We aren’t approving new Public Works positions and we are <br />losing Safer Grants in 2027. We don’t have another $1 million for the six additional full time <br />employees (FTEs) they are requesting. We are going to end up taxing residents out of their home <br />and she doesn’t want to do that. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding how some of the other Cities are in support and the others are still <br />deciding. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.