Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular COUncil Meeting, 7-30-90 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />ORD. (Cont'd) <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone =rnmented that the city of Shoreview <br />requires 100 percent of net profits J:::e expended in the <br />trade area. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CouncilInember Mahowald questioned if charities will J:::e excluded from <br />participating in Arden Hills if this requirement is ~. <br /> <br />Herb King, representing the Light Brigade, stated st. Paul Turners may have <br />difficulty meeting the requirement since they are a school and are located in st. <br />Paul. <br /> <br />'lhe Mayor explained the higher percentage may drive revenue sources out of the <br />city. Sather pointed out Shoreview has only Class B licenses for pull-tab <br />operations and no Class A license operations. He favored inclusion of the <br />restriction at the reduced percentage to allow the charities to =ntinue to <br />operate in the city and generate donations f= local organizations. <br /> <br />CouncilInember Mahowald favored reduction to 50 percent; questioned if the "trade <br />area" =uld J:::e expanded to include Ramsey County. <br /> <br />Attorney Filla advised the Ordinance may J:::e more restrictive than state law, <br />however, it may not J:::e less restrictive; the trade area is clearly defined. in the <br />law as =ntiguous cities. <br /> <br />councilInember Hansen favored the 75 percent requirement; stated the law provides <br />f= requiring 100 percent. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mahowald moved, seconded by Malone, for purposes of <br />discussion to approve proposed Ordinance No. 268, AN ORDrnANCE AMENDING 0fAPI'ER <br />4, ARTICLE I, DIVISION 5, SECTIONS 5-1;5-1 (A) , (B), (C) AND; 5-2; 5-3; 5-4; 5-5; <br />5-5(A}; 5-5 (A) (1); 5-5 (A) (2); 5-5(B}; 5-6; 5-7; 5-8; 5-10; 5-11; 5-12; AND 5-13; <br />AND ADDING 0fAPI'ER 4, ARTICLE I, DIVISION 5, SECTIONS 5-1(E), (F), (G), (H), (I), <br />(J) AND 5-14 'ID THE ARDEN lllLIS MUNICIPAL roDE REIATING 'ID GAMBLING. Motion <br />carried unanimously. (5-) <br /> <br />Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, to amend Section 5-13 <br />of the proposed Ordinance to delete".. . seventy-five percent" and insert <br />". . . shall expend at least 50 percent. .". Motion carried. (Mahowald, Growe, Malone <br />and Sather voting in favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1) <br /> <br />councilInember Hansen suggested this requirement become effective January 1, 1991, <br />rather than upon publication, to allow time to infonn organizations of the <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Attorney Filla advised it would be preferable to amend Section 5-14 of the <br />proposed Ordinance, pertaining to effective dates. <br /> <br />council discussed insertion of the date of expiration of the tenth license as <br />outlined in Section 5-8. Councilmember Mahowald favored a later date than March <br />1,1991, to allow time for all licenses to be suhnitted for renewal, including the <br />two which have not yet J:::een approved by the State Gambling Control Board. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mahowald moved, to insert the date of December 31, 1991, <br />as the expiration date of the tenth license. Motion died for lack of second. <br />