CC 08-13-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 8-13-90 Page 4 . Council1nember Mahowald expressed concenl re;JardirB' the tilne-frarne for phasing of the project. Dennis Foster explained the permanent structures will be constrocted as financing permits; no definite tiJne-frarne. CASE #90-09 (Cont'd) Council and applicant discussed the access easement from Control Data Corporation. Foster advised the document for access was provided to the City on 8-1-90. Council was referred to the report from Building Inspector Kriesel dated. 8-13-90, re;Jarding an a=ess road for emergency vehicles; Fire O1ief Winkel and. Kriesel agreed that a fire road should be installe:i on the south and. west sides of the site, and along the area separating the north and. south structures. Planner Bergly stated the applicant has agreed to install the fire road far ao::ess and. work with the Fire O1ief on the road design. Council con=e:i that this matter be delaye:i until such time as the Plarming Commission reviews the exterior J:uilding materials for the permanent structure and. the conditions outlined in the Planner's report of 8-1-90 have been addressed by the applicant. . Malone move:i, secome:i by Mahowald, to table Case #90-09, to the Regular Council meeting held September 10, to allow the applicant time to address the concerns outlined in the Planning Commission minutes dated. 8-1-90 and. sul:lnit information requested far Planning and Council review. Motion carried unani1nously. (5-0) CASE #90-10, MINOR SUED. & VARIANCE, HAMLINE AVE/AMBLE lID, MEYER/MEDLIN Council was referre:i to the Plarmer's report and Plarming Commission minutes dated 8-1-90, relating to the application far a minor subdivision of Lot 6, Borstad Division and lot area variance for two of the three lots proposed, James Meyer, Attorney for estate of Bernice Medlin . Planner Bergly advised the Planning Commission recommende:i approval of the minor subdivision, conditioned upon the four items listed in the Planner's report of 8-1-90 and with an additional comition that the existing home on LDt A be raze:i prior to issuance of J:uilding permits far aIr:! of the three lots. James Meyer explained the applicant has agreed to all the conditions suggested, however, he requested Council consider amerrling the condition relating to razing the existing dwelling. Meyer advised the incli vidual proposing to purchase the property intends to develop LDt C and requests razing the dwelling on Lot A be delaye:i until such time as a OOilding permit is sought for LDts A or B or within three years. council questioned if the dwelling is vacant. . Meyer advised the house is vacant at the present time and the purchaser plans to rent the home until such tilne as a new home is constructed on Lot C. Council questioned why the applicant did not consider subdividing the parcel into two lots which would meet ordinance requirements.