Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Minutes of the Arden Hills Council Worksession/Budget Hearin;J, 11-19-90 <br /> Page 2 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING; May= Sather opened the Public Hearin;J at 6:00 p.m., for <br /> 1991 PROPOSED the purpose of reviewing the Arden Hills 1991 proposed <br /> . BUJ:X;Er Budget, as required by the state of Minnesota, Truth in <br /> Taxation law. <br /> Deputy Clerk Iago verified publication of the Notice of Hearin;J in the st. Paul <br /> pioneer Press on Wednesday, November 14, 1990. <br /> Clerk Adrninistrat= Berger reviewed the proposed 1991 Budget Revenue and <br /> Expenditure Funds and co:nparisons of both funds fram previous years. He noted the <br /> loss of local government aid fram the state of Minnesota and reviewed the effect <br /> of the loss on the revenue funds. <br /> Council advised those in attendance the state has shifted aid fram cities to <br /> school districts and encouraged all present to also attend the public hearings <br /> scheduled by the school district and at the county. '!here was discussion relative <br /> to the division of tax dollar between the three entities and Council explained <br /> that the school district is the recipient of the largest p:>rtion of the taxpayer <br /> dollar; only 15% of the tax dollar returns to the City. <br /> Council explained the budget in=ease is approximately six percent, which <br /> basically reflects the Consumer Price Index cost of livin;J in=ease. <br /> Mayor Sather acknowledged receipt of the two letters statin;J opposition to the <br /> proposed budget; Charles Chenoweth, 1898 Noble Road, and Andrew Wolf, 1347 Arden <br /> view Drive. He stated he received a telephone call fram Bans Molenar, resident, <br /> stating opposition to the proposed J:udget. <br /> . Mayor Sather asked if there was anyone present who wished to be heard either in <br /> fav= of or opposed to the 1991 proposed OOdget. <br /> Several unidentified members of the audience expressed opposition to the proposed <br /> budget and the followin;J issues were discussed: <br /> -Questioned the expenditure items which indicate a ten percent in=ease; <br /> Administrative Office, Public Works/streets, and Park Maintenance. <br /> Council explained the in=ease in Administrative Office is largely due to <br /> prop:>sed salary :in=eases for personnel in conjunction with requirements imposed <br /> by the Comparable Worth law and the addition of a new staff position. '!he Public <br /> Works streets fund is in=eased due to proposed in1plementation of the Pavement <br /> Management Plan. staff advised a plan was initiated and streets were rated for <br /> patchin;J, overlay and reconstruction; the plan will be iIrplemented over a period <br /> of time and monies are budgeted each year for this purpose. '!he Park Maintenance <br /> :in=ease reflects proposed purchasing of equipnent. <br /> -Questioned in=ease in Police and Fire protection. <br /> Council advised the city contracts with Ramsey County Sheriff for p:>lice services <br /> and Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department f= fire protection; these contracts <br /> are non-negotiable and the costs per capita are lower than most metrop:>litan <br /> suJ::urbs . <br /> . <br />