Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 12-10-90 <br /> Page 5 <br /> CASE #90-09 (Cont'd) Malone =ved, seconded by Mahowald, to accept the <br /> development concept as suhnitted, with the condition that <br /> any departure from this concept will be resuJ::mitted to the City as a site plan <br /> . amendment, with the stages of development as outlined under Items 2. A and B, to <br /> be the development plan, and base::1 on the findings, both as listed in the <br /> Planner's report date:i 12-5-90. Motion carrie:i unanimously. (3-0) <br /> Malone moved, secoooe:i by Mahowald, to accept the revised <br /> site plan, dated October 19, 1990, for the first stage and final development <br /> stage, 1::e'>€d on the fin:lings of the Planner as outlined in his report dated <br /> 12-5-90, and incorporatin;r by reference all the site and phasin:J plans provide:i <br /> by the applicant. Motion carrie:i unanimously. (3-0) <br /> Mahovmld noted the applicant indicated willingness to install a baJ:rier of some <br /> type or landscapin:J along the south property line; questioned if this matter <br /> should be incorporated into the conditions. <br /> Malone commenterl the City Engineer will approve the grading and drainage plan and <br /> thus by inplication the applicant offers to insure that drainage is not a problem <br /> to the south. <br /> Malone noted the Planning Cannuission discussed the zoning ordinance reference to <br /> lightin:J and the differentiation between the Imninaire and the lens. He stated <br /> the ordinance requires the luminaire not be visible from the street and the <br /> Plannin;r Commission requested the lens not be visible from the street; questioned <br /> if this is feasible. <br /> Bergly stated it would not be feasible to require the lens not be visible; the <br /> . lightin:J fixtures will match the property to the south of this site. <br /> Foster advise:i he is willin:J to work with staff to meet lighting requirements. <br /> Malone =ved, secoooe:i by Mahowald, to require that the <br /> following general conditions be met prior to issuance of a building pennit, for <br /> this site: <br /> A. That the two lots be combined and that appropriate utility and drainage <br /> easements be granted to the City, subject to administrative approval. <br /> B. That a document providing a pennanent access easement across the Control Data <br /> Corporation drive fram Lexington Avenue to the west parking lot, and <br /> preferably to Fernwocxi Avenue, be approved the city Attorney. <br /> C. That easement be granted for fire lanes as require:i. <br /> D. That the City Engineer approve the grading and drainage plan and that the <br /> Rice Creek Watershed District issue an appropriate pennit. <br /> E. That the City park de:iication requirements be satisfie:i. <br /> F. That a landscaping 0000 be posted in an amount to be detei:mined by the <br /> Planner . <br /> Motion =ie:i unanimously. (3-0) <br /> Council1nernber Malone advised the applicant that the park dedication is to be <br /> negotiated with Councillnember Mahowald, and that the drainage plan approval <br /> includes responsibility of the owner to provide any corrective measures necessary <br /> if drainage problems occur on adjacent properties. <br /> . CASE #90-17; MINOR Council was referred to the Planner's report and <br /> SUBDIVISION, 1245 Planning minutes dated 12-5-90, relative to the <br /> NURSERY HILL cr, application for a minor subdivision at 1245 Nursery <br /> EIBENSTEINER Hill Court I Robert and Marcel Eibensteiner. <br />