Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ;CUNC,L Minu~ ORD• #284; Council was referred to the me.morandtnn fram the Clerk <br /> ;;~,TEO D 0-1ARITABLE Adninistrator dated 12-26-92, relating to the proposed <br /> ~ <br /> GP'MBLING REGULA'1'IONS amenchnP.nt to the Charitable Gambling Ordinance <br /> definition of the "Trade Area". <br /> The Clerk reviewed the two options for Council consideration, as outlined in the <br /> 12-11-91 lettex from Attorney Filla; 1. Selection of a percentage amount <br /> requirement other than the currently requested 50 percent experxiiture within the <br /> trade area and expandinq the trade area to include support of govexmne.nt entities <br /> within Ramsey County; or 2. Repeal the current trade area regulations entirely. <br /> Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to amerdne.nt Ordinance <br /> No. 284, SECTION 443, RELATIlNG To THE RDGiJLATION OF CE1ARITABLE GANIBLING, <br /> retaining the 50 percent expei-iditure in the trade area and adding language <br /> supporting the activities of a goverr~ne,ntal entity within Ramsey County. Motion <br /> carried unanimously. (5-0) <br />