My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-25 WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-10-25 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2025 9:01:10 AM
Creation date
12/16/2025 9:01:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 10, 2025 10 <br />on the 10-year deferred assessment from Ramsey County. We aren't getting 100% of the dollars <br />in one year. It's spread out over 10-years. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the $3.3 million is not only for the <br />streets projects. <br />Councilmember Holden understands that it also includes water and sewer. When we look at the <br />budget, we say it's $3.3 million. <br />Discussion ensued that the levy is based on the budget, which includes both expenditures and <br />revenues. It looks deceiving because we have a budget number that considers all <br />revenues/assessments. The levy is meant to balance out the activity within the fund balance. <br />Mayor Grant said the previous year's unfunded levy cost is $122,000. It is conceivable that we <br />will have our 50% at the end of the year, after Director Yang completes her analysis. If we have <br />that, why would we include it? We've already made it up this year. <br />Councilmember Weber thought it is because we don't have the money yet. He said by removing <br />the money that we owe, despite the fact that there may be $500,000 waiting there to pay it off, we <br />are underfunding the budget with the anticipation that we can pay back that $122,000. He isn't <br />comfortable doing that. He understands the argument for why we may want to. It seems like an <br />easy place to reduce our levy, but we don't have that money yet. We can't guarantee that. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if Finance Director Yang has looked into it and talked to each of <br />the Division Directors. <br />Finance Director Yang asked if she was referring to the 2025 projections. <br />Councilmember Holden confirmed. <br />Finance Director Yang said she hasn't shared the projections with the Division Directors yet. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if she will have that for Council before December. She said it <br />isn't any different than the rest of the numbers we get. We believe Director Yang is doing a good <br />job so we have to believe she is correct in projecting what the surplus will be. <br />Mayor Grant said he got confirmation from Director Yang that she can firm up the numbers by <br />November 17. We are trying to maintain a 50% fund balance. If we get there, then he will talk <br />about under funded balances for the budget because we don't spend the entire budget. We haven't <br />gotten there. We don't have the numbers firmed up. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said it isn't clear where the $500,000 is coming from. If it's <br />something that we have over -budgeted in the past, we.can-look at budgeting more appropriately <br />next year. <br />Finance Director Yang said it is not due to over -budgeting. There is some personnel savings in <br />there and there is favorability on the revenue side for permit fees and building projects. Those <br />revenues were higher than anticipated vs. the budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.