My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-25 WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-10-25 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2025 9:01:10 AM
Creation date
12/16/2025 9:01:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 10, 2025 7 <br />Councilmember Monson is open to reducing the EDA levy and she wants to transfer the <br />$165,000. She said if we don't add to the PIR Fund we can't fund the things that are core for the <br />City. She is not okay with it being zero. She would be open to reducing it a little to try to lower <br />the levy points. She said we have the General Fund, the PIR Fund, the EDA Fund, the Equipment <br />Building Fund, Public Safety Fund. All of those things should be self-sustaining. They shouldn't <br />be relying on General Fund revenue. Transferring General Fund dollars out of that operating fund <br />to help support funding another bucket is not sustainable. She would like to get away from <br />assuming the General Fund will float the rest of our funds. It appears there is a $500,000 savings, <br />but she isn't interested in transferring that money to a fund that we previously chose not to fund <br />with a sustainable approach. She asked if we reduced the PIR by $60,000 would we be out of the <br />red in five years? Ten years? <br />Finance Director Yang said if we increase the PIR levy by $120,000 annually, and shifted the <br />PMP Projects, we would be green for the next 10 years. Without shifting the projects, we would <br />be in the green through 2029. <br />Councilmember Weber is pleased to hear we're coming in under budget for the year. That is like <br />a bonus. This year's success is next year's benefit and it shouldn't impact how we make any <br />decisions right now. <br />Councilmember Holden said in the past, the City has always underfunded the budget a small <br />amount. These are estimates and things happen. The PIR Fund is looking out 20 years and shows <br />us in the hole. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen has a replacement schedule. We <br />may not approve every single thing. The numbers are plugged in to create the estimates but that <br />doesn't mean it will all happen. If we move under that presumption, we might as well raise the <br />levy to 30%. <br />Mayor Grant agrees. Projects are lined up ten years out. They may not happen exactly the way <br />they are laid out in the schedule. We are planning, but they may not happen in that year or in that <br />amount. We need to manage. This year the Fire Department, Police Department and City Staff <br />increases are all coming due at once. He would like to smooth that trend before increasing the <br />levy. He sees the need for Capital. He thinks $180,000 is too high in a year like this. We should <br />not be at 18%. <br />Councilmember Weber agrees we should not be in this position. He said underfunding the levy <br />previously is exactly why we are in this position. We should be trying to fix this PIR Fund. It is in <br />a dire state because of lack of attention. <br />Councilmember Holden said we have always had a surplus to carry over to fill this stuff. We <br />have the money out there. She doesn't want to hear it's because it's been underfunded. A lot of <br />things have come due all at the same time. We have done well. People love living in Arden Hills. <br />They are happy. They like that the taxes are low. It brings in businesses. Residents have <br />affordable homes where they aren't paying the same tax as other communities. She said it's <br />always blamed on everyone else. We didn't have the PIR Fund in dire straits until about two years <br />ago. We don't have to speak loudly to make sure everyone will take our side. We need to look at <br />what we have. <br />Mayor Grant said we are currently projecting approximately a $500,000 surplus. Staff is not <br />overspending their budgets. We have a lot of budget centers. There should always be the budget <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.