Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMM:ISSION - APRIL 2, 2003 6 <br /> 9. That the oil and sand location on the site plan be deleted and the waste oil drop <br /> . off be incorporated into the existing County waste oil storage on the site and the <br /> County come up with an acceptable method to convey that waste oil into their <br /> container. If that is deemed unworkable the County come back to the City to <br /> amend their site plan. <br /> IO. That the landscape plan include landscaping to the west side of the building not <br /> knowing when the National Guard will build their facility. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if it was proper that they do not approve the waste oil <br /> maintenance facility and instead have them come back with a plan at a later date for <br /> review by the Commission. Chair Sand replied that would require an amendment to the <br /> motion. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman noted the reason he included it was because there was a <br /> location shown on the site plan that they did not feel was an appropriate place, so he <br /> wanted residents to be able to drop off oil at the same place that the County placed their <br /> oil. He indicated they could discuss not having waste oil on the property. Commissioner <br /> Larson stated he was fine with the motion as it stood. <br /> Chair Sand asked if the motion as presented was agreeable to the County. Mr. Heider <br /> replied the condition would require residents to hand the waste to an employee who <br /> would carry the waste into the building for disposal. He noted from a safety issue, it <br /> would be difficult to have people behind the building dropping off their oil. <br /> . Commissioner Bezdicek asked if this would preclude residents dropping off the oil <br /> outside of business hours. Mr. Heider replied that was correct. The oil would need to be <br /> dropped off during business hours. <br /> Commissioner Ricke suggested either the disposal had to be a part of their own disposal <br /> or they needed to present an aItemative plan that was approved by the Commission. Mr. <br /> Parrish replied the County could determine fyom their operations if there was a need for <br /> this type of a facility, they could amend their site plan at a future date. <br /> Chair Sand noted their intention was to not allow the drop off facility at the front, but <br /> rather to provide an alternative site on the property. <br /> The motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br /> B. PLANNING CASE 03-09 : BRUCE GODE. 3538 GLEN ARDEN ROAD, <br /> VARIANCE <br /> Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. <br /> Mr. Hellegers stated applicants were requesting a 6-foot variance from the minimum side <br /> yard setback for one side. This variance would allow construction of an attached 24x26 <br /> . garage four feet from the northern property line. :Mr. Hellegers reviewed their report <br /> dated March 27, 2003 and recommended denial of the Site Plan Review for the reasons as <br /> outlined in their report. Mr. Hellegers noted this public hearing had been properly <br /> noticed. <br /> .- <br />