My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 05-07-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2003
>
PC 05-07-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:14 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:42:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 3 <br />. Commissioner Ricke asked if the report had taken into account what would happen with <br /> the traffic once TCAAP developed and Guidant expanded. Mr. Hellegers replied they <br /> could request an updated traffic study when the POD was presented. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked ifit was the intent of the church that in the future when <br /> large events did occur, that traffic control personnel would be hired to manage the traffic <br /> flow in and out of the site. <br /> Ken Kems, architect, replied there would be a signal at the Highway 96 intersection and <br /> they had traffic control personnel at all of their events, and he believed with the traffic <br /> signal in place that would also help. He stated until the signal was put in by the County, <br /> they would have traffic control personnel there. <br /> Chair Sand asked if they could encourage the County to put the light in before the <br /> TCAAP was developed. Mr. Anderson replied if there was a need for the light, the <br /> County had indicated they would put one in, but until that time, they would use traffic <br /> control personnel at any events. <br /> Chair Sand asked what percentage of traffic would exit off of Highway 96. Mr. Kerns <br /> replied he believed they would be able to get people off the site much faster than they <br /> could at the present time and he believed most people would use the Highway 96 exit. <br />. Chair Sand noted the parking on the east side of the lot was larger than the northern side <br /> and he questioned if they would actually exit onto Highway 96. He stated he believed <br /> most people would use North Snelling because it was more convenient. Mr. Kerns <br /> replied it depended which way people wanted to go out onto Highway 96. If they were <br /> going west on Highway 96, they would want to use the signalized traffic 'control at their <br /> main entrance. <br /> Chair Sand requested they have a better explanation of the traffic flow percentage going <br /> in and out of the site before they present their POD. <br /> Chair Sand stated they should assume they are a church in a residential area and not a <br /> commercial development and therefore the landscaping needed to be enhanced, <br /> Chair Sand asked what type of landscaping was along the east side. Mr. Parrish replied <br /> there was no berm and there would be maple trees planted along the east side. <br /> Chair Sand suggested a berm and deciduous trees be placed along the east side. <br /> Chair Sand expressed concern about the scrolling text on their sign. He asked if the new I <br /> I <br /> sign would conform to the sign ordinance. Mr. Parrish noted that the current sign was a I <br /> conditional of approval for that sign and staff would contact the church about this and <br /> remind them that the sign needed to conform to the conditions of the Commission. <br />. Chair Sand stated if they were going to request two large free-standing signs, the church <br /> would need a good reason for that request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).