My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 01-05-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2005
>
PC 01-05-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:15 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:47:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 5, 2005 5 <br /> . Chair Sand requested Mr. Temali take some photographs of the field for ,the February <br /> meeting. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated he would like all of the suggested institutions be able to take <br /> advantage of this proposal and not just Mounds View School District. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman noted version three was the only version that addressed all of <br /> the possible requests Mounds View School District had brought forward at the last <br /> meeting, such as naming rights and scoreboard advertising. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked how far the City wanted to open the d06r when they <br /> created this language. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated he was in favor of this proposal as a revenue generator for <br /> the School District. <br /> Mr. Clark stated it was staffs intent to limit advertising sponsorship to the "institutions" <br /> only. <br /> , <br /> I <br /> Mr. Temali suggested they limit the advertising sponsorship to only fields qwned by the <br /> institutions, which would not include City parks. ' <br /> Commissioner Larson asked ifthere was a weekend tournament, would it still be possible <br /> . to get a permit for temporary signage at the City fields. Mr. Clark replied permits would <br /> still be available. <br /> Chair Sand stated he would be in favor of option 2, striking the Little League. <br /> Mr. Clark asked what type of a banner size the School District would be loqking at. Mr. <br /> Temali replied when they spoke with the sign company, they suggested a 3 x 10 foot <br /> banner. He stated each individual sign being limited to ten square feet wol\ld give them <br /> enough visibility. He stated an 80 square feet total would also limit them and he <br /> requested this be reconsidered. He noted the prime banner spot would probably be in <br /> front of the visitor stands, which would not be visible from the street. He stated the only <br /> possible place a banner would be visible from the street would be from the north end <br /> zone. He indicated he would like to present further information as to their needs for the <br /> size of the signs they needed at the next meeting. <br /> Commissioner Modesette stated she was in general opposed to advertising signage as this <br /> was incongruent with education, but she understood the need for additional school <br /> financing. Mr. Temali agreed with this comment and noted they had held off requesting <br /> this as long as they could, but with the financial times they were in, the School District <br /> had asked the schools to look at entrepreneurial options to bring in funds. <br /> , <br /> Chair Sand asked how would the City limit what type of advertising would be on the <br /> . banners without running into a Freedom of Speech issue. Mr. Temali replied the School <br /> District would draft policies as to what would and would not be allowed to be advertised <br /> on the banners. He noted there would be no tobacco or alcohol advertising allowed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.