Laserfiche WebLink
<br />';~in'3nC~J the irnprol/,3m'~""n';~s (p. 36J. <br /> <br />7. F'<:JI'k dBdlca-rions in ArcG" Hi lis are based on I-a\<! ~and <br />'1"altH:;'; and cc:,; at~>) tH) wszd of-or ponding ore cover storm <br />sower requirements. <br /> <br />" <br />~ . <br /> <br />There Is an error on p. 42 - Arden Hi 115 dOBS not require <br />underground parking for any bui Idlng. <br /> <br />9. On p. 44 the report states that ~any co~munlties have re- <br />quirements that are more stringent than the U.B.C. This <br />j s ii' 8gal . <br /> <br />to. We sgrsB that amenities are usually less costly if Installed <br />initially Cpo 46) - This Is why some municipal costs are <br />Increased. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />! I. Pages 45-56 sho~ that increased fees and costs of public <br />Improvements are more dictated by the State government <br />than by local government. The table on p. 54 shows that <br />most fees are set or suggested by the State (even building <br />permits and plan checks are). The proliferation of agencies <br />which a bui Ider must deal with is due to State, not munlci- <br />p~l, regulation, <br /> <br />12. The delays that a bui Ider must endure are not long In <br />Arden Hi lis insofar as they are chargeable to the City <br />government. <br /> <br />13. Va,lances for excellence in land use concepts 6re granted <br />by most municipalities, and It is the,efore incor,ect <br />to read an ordinance which states that lots must be 11,000 <br />sq. ft. and assume that this Is in fact the smallest lot <br />size in the municipality. <br /> <br />14. The report Ignores the fact that many communities, such as <br />Arden Hi lis, ha vo a! lowed the d(we I apment c f townhouses, <br />mob!le home courts and other design concepts whiCh reduce <br />the requirements below those that have beGn considered in <br />the report. <br /> <br />C. ~lany figures ara elCerpted from sources which could have derived <br />them from fact, fancy or dreams. From the report, one can <br />often not determine if the reSOI!rCe has any va'idl~y beyond <br />opinion. A few factual distortions are evident however: <br /> <br />The median lot requirement In the metro aree Is 9500 sq. ft. <br />I. (p. 42), yet tho Appendix study concernl~g s~vin~s with <br />smaller lots (p. IGO) concerned a redUCTion In size from <br />11,000 sq. ft. ',.0 1,500 sq. i'L !dso, i I iustrations on <br />p. 43 were of a magnitude of change which ~ould appear to <br />be irrelevant to the median municipality. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. The tables sho.lng minimum lo~ requirements of varlo~s <br />cities (p. 39) took break poInts which maximize the effect <br />wanted. A break point of 5001 to 8000 etc.. one foot <br />different, could show an altered result. <br /> <br />3. The 15,000 sq. ft. used in tho last paragraph o~ p. 319d <br />appears to be an error - <It leasi' 14,000 sq. ft. wou <br />produce a similar percentage. <br /> <br />BE IT THEREFORE FURTHER RESOLVED that the Arden Hi I Is Councl I <br />requests that before a change of this ~ag~ltu~~.is ma~e,_where the <br />Metropol I tan ~ouncl I can force change In TradiTional :ocal matters, <br />not only must a continuing need be present, but alse The ~hanges <br />must satisfy the need and not produce onerous results in another area. <br />I t has not been shown that many of the Hous I ng Rep'Jrt racmomendat I enS <br /> <br />fulfill these, criteria. <br /> <br />-.2- <br />