My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 05-04-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2005
>
PC 05-04-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:19 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:48:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 4, 2005 2 <br /> Chair Sand asked what staff had in mind for a smaller variance. Mr. Hellegers showed a <br />. mock up of what a smaller sign could look like. He noted in terms of size, he believed it <br /> went back to the other signs they had in the City, such as the Cub sign, which was 100 <br /> square feet and the largest sign in the City at present. He stated there needed to be a <br /> definitive reason to have a sign as large as being proposed. <br /> Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7: 1 0 p.m. <br /> Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the Sign Standard Adjustment to come forward <br /> and make comment. <br /> Bruce Thompson, Assistant Director of Property Management Ramsey County, stated <br /> Commissioner Bennett expressed his regrets that he was unable to attend tonight's <br /> meeting. He apologized for coming to the last meeting with a revised signage plan and <br /> realized that showing a plan at the last minute, did not give the Commission an <br /> opportunity to review the details of the sign request. He stated there were three reasons <br /> they wanted the variance for the overall size including it being in the interest of the <br /> partnership that they were requesting that specific size in order to include all of the <br /> partners they had on the site. He indicated they could meet the sign ordinance by <br /> including Ramsey County Works and Sheriff Patrol only, but he did not believe that was <br /> in the best interest of the partnership. He stated the Sheriff Department had requested a <br /> sign that identified their Department from a great distance. He noted according to the <br /> Traffic Sign Institute, the letters they had on the sign was designed to be readable from <br />. 350 feet at 45-50 mph. He indicated reducing the size of the letters would cause vehicles <br /> to slow down to read the sign, which could lead to traffic problems and/or accidents. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked for an explanation of the lighting. Mr. Thompson <br /> replied the sign would be a boxed sign that had both internal and external lettering. He <br /> stated the large letters would be lit internally on the sign at night. <br /> Chair Sand asked if they had considered redesigning the descriptions so the Sheriffs <br /> Department was lit at night. Mr. Thompson replied the Sheriff Department would be lit <br /> I <br /> up externally. He indicated they were also considering adding the Sheriff~ star next to <br /> their name. <br /> Chair Sand asked if the partnership consisted of the four major entities or the <br /> subdivisions as well. Mr. Thompson replied it included Ramsey County, the City of <br /> Arden Hills, Minnesota Army National Guard, and the Moundsview School District. <br /> Chair Sand stated they could reduce the size of the sign if they got rid !of all of the <br /> subdivisions and only had the four major entities. Mr. Thompson replied they could do <br /> that, but it would not show the Sheriffs Department in that case. <br /> Chair Sand asked if this sign would also show the recycling oil dumping area. Mr. <br /> Thompson replied the sign would not show that area and nobody had approached them to <br />. add additional signage for that facility. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if they had people inquiring where their location was. Mr. <br /> Thompson replied they had inquiries as to where the Public Works and Sheriffs <br /> Department were located. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.