My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 01-06-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 01-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:20 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:55:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ----- <br /> One light pole and fixture have bccn proposed for the uscd oil and HHW collection site. . <br /> While specifics on the lighting were not included in the application materials, the lighting <br /> should comply with Arden Hills' ordinances and be hooded so that the light is only directed <br /> onto the subject property and directed away from adjoining lots or public streets. Another <br /> recommendation would be that the new light pole should match existing lighting on site to <br /> maintain a consistent character for the property. Any new lighting should also be rcviewed <br /> by the Building Official for approval. <br /> 11. Signage - Sign age plans not included in application materials <br /> While the elevations and renderings do show some signage, no signagc has been proposed <br /> with this application. Signage for this project would be processed through a Signage Permit <br /> and would need to bc within the maximum allowed signage in Signage District 6 (Signage <br /> Ordinance, Section 333.6, f) which allows for a maximum of 60 square feet of wall signage, <br /> 45 square fect of freestanding signage with a maximum height of 12 feet, and 6 square feet of <br /> wall mow1ted auxiliary signage and 6 square feet of freestanding auxiliary signage both with <br /> a maximum height of 6 feet. <br /> It is quite possible that the additional auxiliary signage necessary to direct people to the used <br /> oil and HHW site combined with any existing auxiliary signage would exceed the maximum <br /> allowed under the Sign Ordinance and would therefore require a Sign Standard Adjustment. <br /> There may bc some merit for a sign standard adjustment for auxiliary signage due to the size . <br /> of the property, the location of the propcrty, and the many potential users of the property. <br /> Following is the section of the Sign Ordinancc which discusses Sign Standard Adjustments: <br /> (Ordinance 333, Section 333.11) <br /> Sign Standard Adiustments. Adjustments to the requirements and standards for the height, <br /> number, type, lighting, area, or location of a sign or signs established by this ordinance may be <br /> approyed through the Site Plan Review process if the following qualifYing criteria of A of B, and <br /> the necessary criteria of C, are met: <br /> A. There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be <br /> reasonably visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site; Or <br /> B. The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional dcsign or a style that will enhance <br /> the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site; And, after <br /> finding positively on condition A or B above, <br /> C. The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the <br /> zoning district in which the property is located. <br /> The applicant should provide staff with the dimensions for existing auxiliary signage as well <br /> as any proposed auxiliary signage for the uscd oil and HHW site. <br /> \\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2004\04-19 RCPWF SUP Amendment Oil drop site and HHW (PENDING)\OI-05-05 PC Report RCPWl-" SUP . <br /> 2nd Amendment.doc <br /> Page 60f9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.