PCP 01-06-2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F. Any proposed lighting should be hooded to conceal the lighting source and shall be consistent with the Arden l-lills regulations for lighting. Any new lighting should be . rcvicwcd by the Building Official for approval. G. Grading and drainage plans should be reviewed by Ricc Creek Watershed District and the applicant should receive any necessary pcrmits from RCWD prior to the issuancc of a building or zoning permit. H. Plans for auxiliary sign age should be submitted to the City Planner for review. Any adjustments to the sign standards established in the Arden Hills Sign Ordinance would require the review and approval of the Arden Hills City Council. Staff Recommendation In Planning Case #04-19 staffrecommends denial of the Special Use Permit (Second) Amendment and Sitc Plan Review after making the following two findings: 1. Detailed plans for the proposed used oil building havc not been submitted; therefore the Planning Commission is being asked to approve a building without having sufficient detail in regard to the exact size, location, and appearance of thc proposed building. 2. Proposed exterior matcrials do not meet those outlined in thc Civic Center District rcquirements. Options 1. Rccommend approval as submitted. . 2. Recommend approval with conditions. 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing the reasons for thc denial at the time it denies the request." 4. Table for additional information. Deadline for Al!ency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November I, 2004 Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by January 2,2005 (60 days), unless thc city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review period. Thc City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. On December 20, 2004 City Staff informed the applicant in writing that an additional 60 day revicw period would be necessary. Extension of the review period to 120 days allows thc City until March 1. 2004 to act on this request. This extension establishes the maximum amount of time that the City can take to review the request without requesting an additional extension from the applicant. \\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2004\04-19 RCPWF SUP Amendment Oil drop site and HHW (PENDING)\Ol-05-05 PC Rep0l1 RCPWF SUP . 2nd Amendment.doc Page 8 of9 ..