My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 01-06-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 01-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:20 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:55:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - December 1,2004 8 , <br /> Chair Sand asked what the difference was between a therapeutic massage and a . <br /> chiropractor. Ms. Muska replied she was not qualified to do any diagnosis and would not <br /> be involved in skeletal manipulations. Her business would only deal with the tissues. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked if she had considered working for a business that was <br /> already established in massage. Ms. Muska replied initially she would probably work for <br /> a business to get the practice and experience, but she wanted to be around her children, so <br /> eventually she wanted to have a small practice out of her home. <br /> C. DISCUSSION ON BALL FIELD SIGNAGE AT MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL <br /> Mr. Hellegers stated staff had received inquiries from Mounds View School District <br /> about allowing sponsorship signage around the football and track field. Based on staffs <br /> discussion with the MVSD it sounded like the signage would be banner signs that could <br /> be affixed to the fences surrounding the field during the fall football!soccer, and spring <br /> track seasons. <br /> He indicated currently the Sign Ordinance regulates all signage in the City and does not <br /> provide an exemption for ball field signage. <br /> He asked should ball field signage be exempted from the Sign Ordinance regulations and <br /> should specific criteria for ball field signage be established and added to the Sign . <br /> Ordinance to handle the size and type of signage. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman stated he did not have a problem with this request because it <br /> would be jnternal to the ball field and he believed advertising was a part of the process <br /> and there were financial reasons to consider this for the School and since the only people <br /> who were going to see the signage were the people attending the event, he did not see this <br /> as an Issue. <br /> Commissioner Ricke stated she had no objcction to banners being at the ball fields, but <br /> should they have some guidelines for it. She also asked if this should be limited to school <br /> only. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated banners that were only visible inward were a reasonable <br /> request considering the funding that was needed to keep the programs going. <br /> Chair Sand stated they needed to recognize if there were residential homes in the area and <br /> if the banners were visible from the homes. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman suggcstcd all banners be taken down after the particular <br /> sporting season is done. That way, when there were no activities on the field, the signage <br /> would not be there. <br /> Commissioner Holmes suggested thcy might want to take the banners down after every . <br /> game. <br /> Chair Sand noted they could regulate the timing and use of the banners instead of <br /> banning them completely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.