Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> enable the creation of Comprehensive Sign Plans. Unfortunately, due to just . <br /> receiving an example of the Comprehensive Sign Plan the last week in December <br /> there was not time to create language in time for the January meeting. <br /> Attached are the current City Sign Ordinance and three potential revisions which <br /> could address the MVHS signage inquiry. Since there was basically no existing code <br /> language regarding these items from the cities, there was not much for staff to <br /> compare this draft language to. <br /> Staffs recommendation would be to bring this item back with more material to the <br /> February meeting as a continued discussion item. However if the Planning <br /> Commission determines that one of the attached versions (with or without certain <br /> changes) is the preferred method, then staffwiII schedule a public hearing for the <br /> February meeting and bring back the preferred language as amended. <br /> Discussion Ouestions <br /> . Should the Sign Ordinance be changed in the manner of versions I, 2, or 3? <br /> . Should signage at sports fields be something allowed through the standard <br /> City Sign Permit process (it's allowed if it meets criteria of the Sign <br /> Ordinance, requires completed application, application fee, and drawings, <br /> etc.)? <br /> . Should signage at sports fields be permitted only after the issuance of a . <br /> Special Use Permit? Should one style require a Special Use Permit versus <br /> another being allowed through a Sign Permit? <br /> . <br /> I <br /> I <br /> L_ <br />