My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-24-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2026 4:56:10 PM
Creation date
1/13/2026 4:56:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—NOVEMBER 24, 2025 9 <br /> Senior Planner Fransen stated the intent was to meet DNR requirements and to ensure <br /> development would not negatively impact the shoreline. <br /> Councilmember Monson questioned what the City's intent was with a structure coverage <br /> ordinance. <br /> Senior Planner Fransen indicated this would ensure the property had landscaped areas and open <br /> space on the property versus having the entire property covered with structures. <br /> Councilmember Monson reported the requirements she just asked about were in place not for <br /> aesthetics,but rather were in place to protect from environmental issues and to protect the lake. <br /> Senior Planner Fransen reported this was the case. <br /> Councilmember Monson asked what was needed in the three-foot crawlspace. <br /> Senior Planner Fransen explained this space would be used for storage. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau indicated the neighbors have voiced concerns with how the water <br /> quality could be impacted by the proposed permeable pavers and the snow removal. She asked what <br /> grade Lake Johanna had from the DNR. <br /> Senior Planner Fransen stated she did not have this information in front of her. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau commented she recently read that Karth Lake was a B, Round Lake <br /> was not mentioned and Lake Johanna was a D grade for water quality. She inquired how snow <br /> filters into the lake for new construction homes and questioned how effective the permeable pavers <br /> were on properties. <br /> Senior Planner Fransen explained the applicant did not provide specific products that would be <br /> used for the permeable pavers, but would be working with a civil engineer on this portion of the <br /> project. She indicated staff would defer to these professionals to reflect how the permeable pavers <br /> can be utilized while also addressing the concerns that have been raised while also ensuring the <br /> water body was not impacted. She noted the Council could consider a percentage higher than 5% <br /> for the permeable pavers in order to allow for the driveway and patio area to be pavers. <br /> Mayor Grant stated after looking at the case he understood the need for the variances, given the <br /> lot size. He did not believe the flexibility and variance requests were excessive. He expressed <br /> concern with the fact the home would have a crawl space and discussed how water has a way of <br /> moving into structures, especially near waterways. He explained he had pavers in his backyard, <br /> along with cottonwood trees and indicated his pavers still drained. He encouraged the applicant to <br /> fill the gaps .between_ the pavers with sand as this will assist with proper water drainage. He <br /> commented he wvas also concerned about snow storage given how constrained this lot was:_, <br /> Councilmember Holden discussed the variance for the structure setback from the OHWL. She <br /> questioned how much of the previous structure was nine feet from the OHWL versus how much of <br /> the new structure would be 11.2 from the OHWL. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.