My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-25-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-24-25-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2026 4:16:56 PM
Creation date
1/14/2026 4:16:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 24, 2025 3 <br />opportunity for Council to use strategic measures for the final budget deliberations. She outlined <br />some options for use of the budget surplus for Council to consider. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the 58% includes the $122,000. <br />Finance Director Yang said no. It is the actual results and how they will flow through to the <br />current fund balance. <br />Councilmember Holden asked why certain areas aren't prorated out to anticipate a surplus. <br />Finance Director Yang said the budget is set at an annual number. When actuals flow through, <br />we are just comparing against that. <br />Councilmember Holden is confused about the Sheriff Department numbers. She asked why we <br />were so far off on the expenditures. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said that is a number we just received from the Sheriff's Department <br />last week. RCSO had shared during their September and October meetings the anticipated 2026 <br />budget. They also had to do the 2025 reconciliation. We didn't know what the overage would be. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how we know the numbers they are giving us are right. She <br />doesn't trust the Sheriff. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said the numbers they give us are based on some assumptions. They <br />are looking at some personnel cost savings and other revenues to offset. They are taking what <br />they have beginning in July through November under the new contract and making assumptions <br />for December. There are variables that can shift. She will talk with the other administrators about <br />making sure the numbers are being double checked. The $144,000 is still their assumption of how <br />things will end. <br />Councilmember Holden asked why they aren't billing us for that now. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said RCSO said the invoices will come out in February. They won't <br />have actual numbers until after December 31. They will reconcile everything and then invoice the <br />cities. She can ask about partial invoicing. <br />Finance Director Yang added we can accrue the $144,000 in the 2025 budget so it won't hit <br />2026. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if the nearly million -dollar shortfall is only assigned to the <br />contract cities or will it be divided among everything else. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said it is assigned to the contract cities. It is cost associated with the <br />implementation of contract agreement that was settled with the deputies and sergeants labor union <br />agreements. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked how much of the overall budget is assigned to the contract <br />cities vs. the other cities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.