My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-25-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-24-25-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2026 4:16:56 PM
Creation date
1/14/2026 4:16:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 24, 2025 9 <br />Councilmember Weber said it will affect the long-term outlook for the PIR. An email from <br />Administrator Jagoe had a scenario that included the $180,000 to the PIR and the splitting the <br />projects. <br />Finance Director Yang said it didn't include the project split. <br />Councilmember Weber said the email stated that, so it should be clarified. He is happy to hear <br />that because the largest shortfall we saw for the PIR fund projection in that range was $8,000. <br />Councilmember Monson said it sounds like some of these ideas are just mathematical ways to <br />reduce the levy. She asked what a budget adjustment is, what it would look like and provide pros <br />and cons. <br />Finance Director Yang said it is adjusting the budget. For example. if the expenditure budget is <br />$1 million, we would reduce that by $120,000. That would be the amount we would be subject to <br />utilizing that year. It just reduces the overall budget. <br />Councilmember Monson asked how much of the $900,000 is expenditures that aren't spent. <br />Finance Director Yang said about half of it. <br />Councilmember Monson said it's all the same outcome, it is just a question of how we do it. <br />Finance Director Yang said the question is, is a budget adjustment necessary or do we cut our <br />costs by $120,000 in 2026. She doesn't know where we would cut the $120,000. If we don't <br />increase the levy by $120,000, we will have to cut costs by that much to balance the budget. <br />Currently the revenues are less than the expenditures. <br />Councilmember Monson said there is a lot of confusion around how this $122,000 is calculated <br />and why we need to fix it. If there is a deficit budget, that number doesn't just go away. We have <br />this $122,000 deficit from 2025. We know our expenditures are going to be less than that. How <br />does the deficit amount not get calculated? <br />Finance Director Yang said it doesn't go away because we have to think about it as 2025 and <br />2026 separately. In 2025, these are one-time savings. If the revenues and expenditures both came <br />in at 100%, we would still have a $122,000 deficit. <br />Councilmember Monson understands it can't just go away because this is a gap that we <br />budgeted. She asked if there is any way to close that gap without adding a levy point. <br />Finance Director Yang said it either needs to be a levy point or we have to cut costs. <br />Councilmember Holden said the $122,000 also dictates the 50% that we have to have as the <br />reserve. <br />Finance Director Yang said it doesn't because the 50% is based off of the total budgeted <br />expenditures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.