My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 04-06-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 04-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:22 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:56:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . B. City Requirements <br /> Section VIII, D, 4, c and d, ofthe City's Zoning Ordinance state that, <br /> "Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which arise <br /> because of the configuration of a particular parcel. The condition shall not have been created by <br /> the landowner. A variance or variances may be granted from specific provisions of this ordinance <br /> because such land factors as length of a side of a lot, the shape of the lot or the unusual terrain <br /> prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be permitted without variance on <br /> a similar size lot located in the same district, but which lot has no unusual configuration. <br /> Economic conditions alone shall not be grounds for a variance, In no case shall the granting of a <br /> variance impair the health, safety, comfort and general welfare ofthe public, nor will it be <br /> contrary to the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or any other <br /> ordinance ofthe City," <br /> Variance Findinl!s <br /> Minnesota State Stature 462.357, subd. 6, requires that Cities consider the following five matters <br /> when hearing requests for zoning ordinance variances, <br /> . 1. Are the circumstances for which the variance is requested unique to the property? <br /> . <br /> (YES) The properties have the unique feature of a shared driveway. While there are <br /> other properties in the City that have shared driveways, the combination of the shared <br /> driveway with several other features such as; no on-street parking at the location, the <br /> speed of traffic on Lexington Avenue, the amount ofvehicle trips per day on Lexington <br /> Avenue, and the lack of shoulders to provide a safe access; create a very unique situation <br /> for the applicants, <br /> The properties are located with Karth Lake on the west, the park to the south and are cut <br /> off from any access except for directly to Lexington Avenue. Since the properties will <br /> have some access removed with the installation of the center median in the Lexington <br /> Avenue Reconstruction. the additional driveways would provide better access for the <br /> property owners. <br /> Other properties in Arden Hills may be located along busy streets or have shared <br /> driveways but staff has not encountered any other properties that have the same <br /> combination of situations as outlined above, Properties along Highway 96 or Hamline <br /> Avenue may have access to a busy roadway but these properties either have roadway <br /> shoulders where they can move to when trying to access their properties or have far less <br /> \\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\1005\05-09 Radziej and Sabol Dliveway Variances (PENDING}\04-06-05 PC Report Rodziej and Sabot <br /> . Oriveway Variances.doc <br /> Page 3 0/7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.