My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 04-06-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 04-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:22 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:56:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 2, 2005 2 <br /> . PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> A. PLANNING CASE #05-09: DAVID RADZIEJ AND ROGER SABOT, 4365 AND <br /> 4367 LEXINGTON A VENUE; DRIVEWAY VARIANCES <br /> Mr. Hel1egers stated applicants were requesting variances to allow them to maintain the <br /> existing shared driveway and add an additional driveway for each of the applicant's <br /> propelties in the City. Staff recommended approval based on the following conditions: <br /> 1. The applicants shall submit Zoning Permits with plans to the Building Official a <br /> minimum of two (2) weeks before the planned start of construction, <br /> 2, The applicants will require approval from Ramsey County for the cub-cuts prior <br /> to the installation of any new driveway. <br /> 3, The driveways shall be constructed to meet the City standard width of a 12-foot <br /> minimum and a 22- foot maximum, <br /> 4. There shall be at least 60 feet between each driveway access, <br /> 5. Parking shall comply with the Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance requirements of <br /> no parking on any areas except for driveways and parking lots, and shall not <br /> have more than 4 vehicles may be parked on any driveway. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked why previous conditions that had not been met had not <br /> been checked on, Mr. Hellegers replied he did not know why those conditions had not <br /> . been checked up on by staff in 1995, <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked whose responsibility was it that conditions imposed on <br /> the property were met. Mr. Hellegers replied it was City staffs responsibility, <br /> Chair Sand stated there was an e-mail received from a neighbor on 1090 Amble Drive <br /> objecting to the request on five grounds. <br /> Commissioner Bezdicek asked why where they retallllllg the eXlstlllg driveway and <br /> adding two additional ones, Mr. Hellegers replied it would provide better access for the <br /> applicants, <br /> Chair Sand asked if there was anything in the Zoning Ordinance or the Comprehensive <br /> Plan that would limit the addition of a driveway here. He noted mature trees would be <br /> lost to make room for the new driveways. Mr. Hellegers replied there were no conditions <br /> protecting those trees, <br /> Chair Sand asked if it would be a right turn in and right turn out. Mr. Hel1egers replied <br /> that was correct. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked who created the hardship, Mr. Hellegers replied this was <br /> done by a previous owner. <br /> . Commissioner Larson asked if they had originally agreed to the shared driveway, Mr, <br /> Hellegers replied that was correct. <br /> Commissioner Larson noted with Lexington being a commuter street, he assumed the <br /> reason for the shared driveway was to eliminate accesses on Lexington, He stated it <br /> --- -------..--..---- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.