My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 07-06-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 07-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:24 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:58:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE I, 2005 7 <br /> Vice Chair Zimmerman stated hardy board in his opinion was less desirable building . <br /> material than stucco. <br /> Commissioner Larson noted hardy board was a cement board with a baked on finish and <br /> it was not a wood material, so it would not need to be painted. <br /> Commissioner Bezdicek inquired about the driveway off of Highway 96. Mr. Hellegers <br /> replied the applicant would put in a right turn lane in the shoulder and they would need to <br /> repaint that area to indicate the turning lane. <br /> Commissioner Bezdicek asked what was the expected use of the service road. Mr. <br /> Hellegers referred him to the traffic study and noted the primary access would be for <br /> those going westbound on Highway 96 as well as those going north on Hamline Avenue. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated in order to proceed east on Highway 96, they would need to <br /> use the Highway 96 entrance and the only problem would be going west on Highway 96. <br /> Mr. Hellegers replied more often than not in order to go west on Highway 96, they would <br /> need to make a "U" turn at the protected light at Hamline Avenue. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if the 50-foot turn radius was standard, Mr. Hellegers <br /> responded applicant wanted a 50-foot turn radius, but he was not sure a 50-foot turn <br /> radius was possible because of the large power pole on the north side of the driveway. . <br /> Mr. Clark noted the traffic study addressed that concern on page IS of that report. <br /> Vice Chair Zimmerman opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. <br /> Vice Chair Zimmerman invited applicant to make comments. <br /> Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, thanked staff for their work. He indicated they agreed <br /> with all of the conditions in staffs report. He indicated there would be minor changes to <br /> the proposal, including the canopy. With respect to the hardy board, this was an upgrade, <br /> which was more expensive than the stucco work. He noted stucco was not an acceptable <br /> product in the Neighborhood Business district. He indicated the hardy board had a baked <br /> on surface, which would go all of the way up to the top of the window and they would <br /> only put the hardy board where the stucco is located on their elevations. He stated <br /> because this was a POO, they needed to determine if this fit into the neighborhood and <br /> location. He stated they were platting this like a townhouse where the individual <br /> business person will purchase a unit and a lot, but they would also use lot 31 as common <br /> land, which included the parking and green space area. He indicated the lot size per unit <br /> was small than they had in the normal neighborhood business, but in common they were <br /> below or within many of the standards, He noted the traffic engineer had requested they <br /> open the radius as wide as possible. He stated they might be able to shift the driveway a <br /> little to the south, but there was a problem with the large utility pole on the north side of . <br /> the driveway. He stated the right-of-way along Highway 96 was wide enough to <br /> accommodate the right turn lane - it just needed to be striped. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.