Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Resident Comment <br /> . Staff has not received any letters or telephone calls from property owners or occupants in regard <br /> to this planning case. <br /> Options <br /> I. Recommend approval of the minor subdivision and variance as submitted. <br /> 2. Recommend approval of the minor subdivision and variance with conditions. <br /> 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "...it <br /> must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request." <br /> 4. Table for additional information. <br /> Approving the variance is contingent upon approval of the minor subdivision. <br /> Deadline for A2encv Actions <br /> The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on February 6, 2006. <br /> Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by April 6, 2006 (60 days), <br /> unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review <br /> period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 <br /> days. <br /> . <br /> Attachments <br /> 3A-l Application and statement from the applicant <br /> 3A-2 Air Photo and photographs of the site <br /> 3A-3 Survey and architectural drawings from the applicant <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> Planning Commission Meetingfor March 1, 2006 <br /> . IlMe/ro-inet.us\nrdenhillsIPlanningIPlanning Cases\2006\06-005 Koloski minor subdivision and variance (PENDING) \021606 - PC Report- <br /> Koloski Minor Subdivision & Variance. doc <br /> Page 7 of7 <br />