My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-14-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 04-14-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:31 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:05:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I Memorandum - Tabled Special Assessments <br />{t <br /> Page Three <br /> April 9, 1997 <br />I 5. Yargici. 1516 Colleen Avenue (22-30-23-32-0002-1) <br /> a. On the southwest corner of the intersection of Colleen A venue and <br /> Colleen Circle with no distinguishable long side. Both Colleen Avenue <br />I (reclamation) and Colleen Circle (reconstruction) are being improved in <br /> 1997. <br /> b. A combination of both the odd shape lot and corner lot calculation <br />I methods were used to calculate reclamation assessable footage of 49.34 <br /> feet and reconstruction assessable footage of 65.69 feet. <br /> c. The amount of proposed assessment is $3,663.44 (($23.71 x 49.34' = <br />I $1,169.85) + ($37.96 x 65.69' = $2,493.59)) <br />I Attachments B (copies of written objections for tabled cases) and C (detail assessment <br /> calculations for tabled cases) are enclosed for documentation purposes. <br />I Additional Corner Lot Information - Assessment Analysis <br /> Staff analyzed the proposed assessment rolls to determine the variation in corner lot vs. non- <br /> corner lot assessments. It should be noted that corner lots were selected based upon the Arden <br />.. Hills Zoning Ordinance corner lot definition, and not just lots that used the corner lot calculation <br /> method for calculating assessable frontage. Also, unusual parcels were deleted from totals to <br /> facilitate comparison (i.e., McClung and Reiling unplatted parcels for overlay, 1519 McClung <br />I and 1370 Colleen Avenue from reclamation, and 1516 Colleen Avenue from reconstruction). <br /> Following is a tabulation of findings: <br /> Corner % (Disconnt)/Preminm <br />I Parcel TVDe Parcel Count Assessment A verap'e to Non-Corner <br /> Overlav <br /> Comer 16 $ 8,208.28 $513.02 14.5%) <br />I Non-Comer 67 36.007.29 537.42 <br /> Total ~ 44.215.57 532.72 <br />I Reclamation <br /> Comer 9 $25,876.63 $2,875.18 21.1% <br /> Non-Comer 25 59353.52 2.374.14 <br />I Total 34 85.230.15 2.506.77 <br /> Reconstruction <br /> Corner 6 $27,916.40 $4,652.73 5.9% <br />I Non-Comer 2 39552.41 4.394.71 <br /> Total 15 67 .468.81 4.497.97 <br />I Interpretation of this analysis is somewhat problematic in that the basis of the Assessment Policy <br /> is an assessable footage rather than a "per unit" calculation. The higher variation in the <br />~ reclamation parcels is related to the incidence of work being done on both streets at an <br /> intersection, and the number of "shallow lot" calculations for non-comer parcels. <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.