Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> A~M \) I <br /> CITY OF ARDEN HILLS I <br /> .. <br /> MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: April 8, 1997 <br />TO: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator I <br />FROM: Terrance Post, City Acconntant @J I <br />SUBJECT: Corner Lot Assessment Research <br />In preparation for the April 14, 1997 regular Council meeting in which tabled proposed I <br />assessment appeals will be reconsidered by the Council, I have investigated how neighboring I <br />cities deal with comer lot assessments from a policy perspective. Following is data from this <br />inquiry. <br /> Residential Reconstruction Arden Mounds New I <br /> Corner Lot Assessment Hills View Bri~hton Roseville Shoreview <br />1. Basis of Assessment Footage Footage Unit* Footage Unit <br />2. No. of Units for I <br /> Non-subdividable N/A N/A 1.0 for N/A 1.0 (.5 unit <br /> Comer Lot short side short side and .. <br /> (not in .5 unit for long <br /> assessment side) different <br /> roli for long unit costs by <br /> side) street I <br />3. Footage Computation of 100% of 100% of N/A 100% of N/A <br /> Assessment short or short side short side I <br /> long side and 25% and 10% of <br /> unless oflong long side <br /> hoth side I <br /> improved <br /> within 5 yrs., <br /> then short <br /> side + l/3 long I <br /> side or iong side, <br /> whichever is <br /> greater I <br />4. Costs Assessed 50% 50% 25%+ 25% 0% roadbed! <br /> 100% of surfacing + 100% <br /> new curb of curb, gutters & I <br /> & gutter storm sewer if <br /> not previousiy <br /> existing, other- I <br /> wise 0% as well <br />. Assumed 75' lot .. <br /> I <br /> --- <br />