My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-14-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 04-14-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:31 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:05:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I D'7":>- ;\ ((WI <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 31, 1997 -~~\J~r 9 <br />I <br />" Mr. Olson asked if an amortization schedule for the next eight years would be available for his <br /> use. Mr. Terry Post, City Accountant, replied the roll is certified to Ramsey County, and the <br /> Ramsey County Property Records Department should be able to provide him with this <br />I information. <br />I Mr. Olson stated he would like to ascertain this information before his assessment becomes due, <br /> to determine if he will pay in installments or one lump sum. Mr. Post requested that Mr. Olson <br /> call him at his office and he would try to give him an estimated schedule of payments. <br />I Hamid Ziai-Mehr, 1498 Royal Lane, stated his concern with the fairness of the assessment on <br /> corner lots. He stated that a corner lot means more maintenance, less privacy, but higher taxes, <br />I and he does not feel this to be just. <br /> Dennis Schumacher, 1375 Indian Oaks Trail, gave a bench handout to Council consisting of a <br />I statement by his Realtor which states the amount of the assessment will not be consistent with <br /> the added value to his property. <br />I The public hearing was closed at 8:55 p.m., at which time Mayor Probst declared a recess. He <br /> requested that all other written objections to assessments be submitted at that time. <br />'e At 9:26 p.m., Mayor Probst announced the appeals were still being reviewed, and stated some of <br /> the more complicated ones, may be held over to the next regular Council meeting. <br />I At 9:32 p.m., Mayor Probst reconvened the meeting. He announced that City Attorney John <br /> Miller would give a brief overview of the appeals process. <br />I Mr. Miller began by stating all citizens have a right to submit a written objection at the meeting, <br /> and the City Council will respond to all appeals at the meeting. The appeal must be in writing to <br />I be able to be appealed to District Court if it is rejected by the City Council. The citizen must <br /> serve the Mayor and City Council with notice of court action within thirty (30) days of adoption <br /> of the assessment. Within ten days of this service, the appeal must be filed with the Court <br />I Administrator. <br /> At 9:35 p.m., Mayor Probst re-opened the public hearing, and stated this public hearing would be <br />I continued to the next regular City Council meeting, as there were issues that would not be able to <br /> be resolved at the present meeting. <br />I Councilmember Malone requested anyone else that had not yet submitted a written objection to <br /> do so. He stated he will make a motion to adopt the roll except for those written objections <br />I received at this meeting. <br /> - <br /> Mr. Fritsinger inquired if the motion would be specific with the rates adopted earlier in the <br />" meeting. Mr. Miller stated that would be the case. <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.