CCP 02-10-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-.------- '. The developer explained that they would like to build some amount of flexibility into the I plans for each unit, in regards to decks and/or porches, so that the units could receive some level of customizing. The Staff explained that the PUD would need to be amended .. to accomplish that flexibility, and thus this application (Planning Case 97-02). The plans as submitted by the applicant (Planning Case 97-02) show the original 14 foot by 18 foot area for porches and/or decks to the rear of the unit. The plans also show two 8 foot by I 12 foot decks one to the rear of the unit the other to the side of the unit. The plans as submitted by the applicant (Planning Case 97-02) also state that the total deck area for each unit will not exceed 260 square feet, the decks may have stairways, and the decks I may be built up to easement lines. C. Planning Commission Recommendation I The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 97-02, Planned Unit Development amendment (decks on side and/or rear of structures), subject to the following conditions: I 1. Compliance with the applicable conditions of approval of Planning Case 95-05; 2. Total deck area for any unit shall not exceed 260 square feet in area, including I stairways; 3. Porches and/or decks shall not be constructed within easement and setback areas; I 4. Modification of the 8 foot by 12 foot "possible deck" which currently exists on Unit # 7 such that it does not encroach into the easement by March 1,1997; and 5. Modification of the 14 foot by 18 foot "possible porch" on Unit # 9 such that it .. does uot encroach into the 30 foot setback requirement from the development boundary. D. Notes I 1. Pursuant to Section V, L, 5, d, of the Zoning Ordinance a four/fifths (4/5's) majority of the full City Couucil is required to approve (modify) a Planned Unit I Development. 2. Pursuant to Section VIII, E, 4, of the Zoning Ordinance no application which has been denied wholly or in part shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months I from the date of the denial. E. Updates I Letters from several residents regarding this project are attached (Exhibit B). Case 97-03. Cardiac Pacemakers Inc.. 4100 Hamline Avenue. PUD amendment I A. Request I The petitioner is requesting approval of an amendment to their previously approved Planned Unit Development (Planning Case 89-10) to allow for the expansion of Building E at their campus which is located at 4100 Hamline Avenue (Exhibit C). I .. I