Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ---- <br />8ft'J., '. <br />Date 02/05/97 I <br />To: Plallllillg COlllllli:;sioll .. <br />From Sharon Turgeon <br />I, i'\'lemorandum dated No\' I~. 1995 item #17 stated <br /> "distance between units 5 & 6 and the 66 toot easement is now at least 2"1,5 Ii .- I <br />The plan is now showing the units to be within 10 feet. I <br /> The couneil and statfassured the public allhattime thaI the building was 24 teel Ii'om the 1 <br /> easement <br /> (attaclllllellts) I <br />2 The (i)otprint has changed greatly f['omthe appro\'ed plans of No\' 13,1995: <br /> The appro\'ed plan shows the square filOtto be 2305 I <br /> Upper floor is 1741 <br /> Ci:1.rage is 564 I <br /> Tntal nnnn 2~05 <br /> Now the plan shows: (for unit I) .. <br /> Upper 110m 1790 (1722 + 68 for boxes) <br /> Garage is 552 <br /> Porch 216 1 <br /> subtotal------ 2558 <br /> Decks 192 <br /> Total ____m__ 2750 I <br />Because the buildings are enlarged fl'om the appro\'ed plans. it is important that <br />the city require buffering either by berms or plant material. I <br />~, If the decks are approved, they should be placed within the lines on the site plan, I <br /> ". I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> .. <br /> I <br />