My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-24-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 02-24-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:40 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:05:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Dr; r 1\~T '1 <br /> j ,,-:'l\..iJ~r- - <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRU ARYl O. 1997 8 <br /> Mr. Tolaas reported that Ramsey County and BRW Engineers support an alignment shift to the I <br /> north in the western segment reconstruction of Highway 96. The full impact ofthis shift has not .. <br /> yet been determined, however their goal is to minimize displacements to the extent possible. Mr. <br /> Tolaas explained the purpose of coming before the City Council tonight is to get an idea of <br /> which direction the City Council would like the County to take in this project. I <br /> Mayor Probst inquired regarding the right-of-way requirement with regard to the wider median. <br /> He inquired if the trail being place on the north or south side of the highway would make a I <br /> difference in the width of the median. Mr. Tolaas replied that as long as the trail was along the <br /> access road, the median would be the same width. He explained that Ramsey County Parks <br /> personnel would prefer to placc the trail on the north side of the frontage road and keep it in I <br /> approximate alignment with the rest of the path network, which is on the south side of the <br /> Highway 96 section. <br /> Mayor Probst expressed concern that the trail will be in between the eastbound lanes of Highway I <br /> 96 and the frontage road. Mayor Probst inquired if the Gateway Business District traffic studies <br /> have been completed, and if the double left lane will become a potential traffic issue in the 1 <br /> future. Mr. Tolaas indicated this could become a concern in the future. <br /> Mayor Probst remarked the connection to the new entrance crosses land that is now a park I <br /> easement. He inquired to what extent the County would share these revision costs, if they would <br /> be isolated to the roadway only or if the impacts extend to the park easement would the County t,I <br /> provide funds for these costs also. Mr. Tolaas requested clarification of the question, if Mayor <br /> Probst was mainly concerned with recreational property. <br /> Mayor Probst indicated his main concern is if these costs would also be eligible for recovery by I <br /> the City. Mr. Tolaas replied it was a reasonable assumption that they would be. <br /> Mayor Probst inquired regarding the access drive to the south. He inquired if the County will I <br /> pay for the acquisition of this property. Mr. Tolaas replied affirmatively, and clarified his answer <br /> by referring to the overhead. I <br /> Mayor Probst inquired if this was a baseline cost of this project. Mr. Tolaas replied that it was. I <br /> Mr. Tolaas further stated these costs should also be eligible for State Highway funds. <br /> Mayor Probst commented that Arden Hills could cover a larger development parcel with their I <br /> own money if necessary. <br /> Councilmember Malone requested clarification of the Round Lake access cost participation for I <br /> Arden Hills. Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator, replied that Ramsey County had previously <br /> indicated it was not willing to participate in that area. <br /> Mr. Tolaas discussed the criteria for State aid, based on whether the project was an improvement . <br /> or an existing alignment. -. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.