My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-24-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 02-24-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:40 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:05:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> .. DRAfT <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 10.1997 3 <br /> I 5. Computations by Staff for Floor Area Ratio, Lot Coverage and Landscape Lot area are in <br /> " question. <br /> She asked the Council to apply the following conditions to the applicant's request; <br /> I I. Requirement of City Council approval of decks and porches on a unit-by-unit basis. <br /> 2. Require the builder to honor the 24.5 foot setback on Unit #5. <br /> . 3. Require the builder to move the rock wall 6 feet northward to conform to City Code and <br /> state law. <br /> 4. Require screening along the west side property line to compensate for the clearing of <br /> . open space and the larger units. <br /> 5. The 66 foot trail easement must be marked as a Ramsey County open space easement on <br /> . the City Comprehensive Plan maps, current and futurc. <br /> There were no further public comments. <br /> I UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> I A. Planning Case #97-02, Dan Ogren, County Road E-2 and Old Highway 10, PUD <br /> Amendment <br /> .. Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, reviewed for the City Council that the <br /> applicant is requesting approval of a minor amendment to a previously approved Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD) in the R-I Single Family Residential Zoning District. The minor <br /> I amendment would allow the construction of decks or porches off the rear and/or side of the units <br /> (Exhibit A). <br /> I Mr. Ringwald stated the applicant is requesting flexibility in the plans to allow for buyer <br /> preferences as it relates to decks and patios off the side and rear of the units. <br /> I Mr. Ringwald stated the deck on Unit #7 is encroaching into the setback area at this time. The <br /> developer plans to remedy this situation by pulling the deck on Unit #7 back and to the southeast <br /> . of the unit to comply with the setback/easement requirements. Mr. Ringwald stated the applicant <br /> has also agreed to modify the "possible porch" on Unit #9 to comply with the setback/easement <br /> requirements. <br /> I Mr. Ringwald stated all other decks/porches in the current plan meet City building requirements. <br /> I Mr. Ringwald discussed the relocation of the Ramsey County trail to the north. He stated that at <br /> this time, the relocated trail is not well defined, and this has led to some confusion among the <br /> residents in the area. Given that this is a County trail, staff has asked that the residents forward <br /> I these comments to Ramsey County. <br /> .. Mr. Ringwald reviewed the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this PUD <br /> amendment subject to the following five Staff conditions: <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.