My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-10-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 03-10-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:40 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:05:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> I Decision Resources, Lid. <br /> {' February, 1997 <br /> I General Perceptions of the City: <br /> Location, high quality schools, and available housing were the major reasons offered for settling <br /> I in the community; thirty-seven percent mentioned the first reason, while twenty percent cited <br /> schools and eighteen percent pointed to housing. Small town ambience, parks, peacefulness, <br /> strong neighborhoods, ruralness, and lower taxes were also positive attributes. A very strong <br /> I ninety-seven percent rated the quality oflife as either "excellent" or "good;" the fifty-one percent <br /> rating it as "excellent" again placed Arden Hills among the strongest ratings within the <br /> Metropolitan Area, In comparison with seven years ago, residents remained extremely satisfied <br /> I with their lives in the community and were still drawn to Arden Hills by the same historically <br /> important factors. <br /> I "Location" within the Metropolitan Area was the most liked feature of the city. At thirty-eight <br /> percent, a level identical to the 1990 benchmark, it dwarfed all other responses. Quiet, strong <br /> I neighborhoods, open spaces, rural ambience, well-run community, good schools, and friendly <br /> people were each cited by between four and nine percent. On the other hand, inadequate city <br /> services, at fifteen percent, unresponsive city govemment, at twelve percent, traffic congestion <br /> Ie and property taxes, each at ten percent, were the most unpopular features of the community. One <br /> change, in line with the rest of the Metropolitan Area, was the decrease in "boosters" who <br /> disliked "nothing" about the city. In 1990, thirty-two percent reported there was "nothing" they <br /> I disliked about Arden Hills; in 1997, the number had dropped to fourteen percent. Even so, this <br /> "booster" segment remained well above the Metropolitan Area suburban norm. <br /> I The trade-off between city services and property taxes appeared to have emerged as the greatest <br /> tension within the community. Proponents of a more activist city government providing a greater <br /> array of city services tended to be relatively recent -- that is, less than ten year -- residents of the <br /> I community. Those much more intense about holding the line on property taxes through a less <br /> activist city government concentrating on basic city services were most apt to be longer term <br /> residents, particularly those living in Arden Hills over twenty years. If this dichotomy continues <br /> I into the future, the City should anticipate a growing demand for a "full line" of city government <br /> services in line with neighboring Ramsey County communities. <br /> I Seventy-eight percent rated the sense of community among Arden Hills citizens as "excellent" or <br /> "good." This result was virtually unchanged from the 1990 benchmark and did not reflect the <br /> I growing trend among suburbs toward greater fragmentation. <br /> I Perceptions of the City "Enterprise:" <br /> Residents continued to feel empowered within the community. Seventy-four percent reported <br /> t' Page 2 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.