Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 7, It is unlikely that the proposed private street will have any detrimental affect on the <br /> . public welfare, Moreover, constructing a full cul-de-sac instead of a private road is <br /> unlikely to offer significant additional public benefit Since a private street is not <br /> maintained by the City, the City will not incur any immediate or future costs for <br /> maintaining the street in this proposed subdivision. Each ofthe four property owners <br /> will be responsible for maintaining the road on Outlot A and Outlot A itself. Finally, <br /> having one access to New Brighton Road is likely to have less impact than four <br /> separate accesses. Given the size of the original two lots, it may be possible to have <br /> four lots adjacent to Thorn Drive and New Brighton with separate driveways, which <br /> would not be desirable, <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> In Planning Case #06-013, Staffrecommends approval of the variance and preliminary plat <br /> based on the seven findings of fact and submitted plans, <br /> The lots in the proposed subdivision meets or exceeds all of the requirements of the underlying <br /> R-2 Zone with three of the four lots more than double the minimum lot size required for the R-2 <br /> Zone, With the recommended conditions, this suhdivision meets is unlikely to have any negative <br /> impact on the City or the neighborhood. <br /> While the City certainly prefers one driveway instead of four, the question is whether a private <br /> drive should be pemlitted instead of the traditionally required street and cul-de-sac. As noted <br /> . above, there is precedent for using private streets in developments; however, those examples can <br /> only be found in PUDs where private streets are permitted, However, since this private street is <br /> unlikely to have a negative impact on the neighborhood and since the cul-de-sac would add <br /> comparatively little value to the City or the neighborhood, Staff recommends approval of the <br /> variance, The City Engineer and Fire Marshal have reviewed the proposed private street and <br /> have not stated any objections to the private driveway, <br /> Once the preliminary plat is approved by the City, no additional conditions related to the design <br /> of the preliminary plat can be added, The final plat is simply a review process to ensure that the <br /> changes required in the preliminary plat have been made. <br /> Staff proposes the following seventeen conditions if approval is recommended: <br /> 1. Thc applicant shall submit the final plat and application to the City of Arden Hills <br /> within three months of the preliminary plat approval date or the approval shall expire, <br /> 2, The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as part of the <br /> preliminary plat and variance application, Any significant changes to these plans, as <br /> determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning <br /> Commission. <br /> City afArden Hills <br /> Planninr; Commission Meetingfor A1ay 5, 2006 <br /> . \'IMclro-illef.us1ardellhills',PlanningIPlanning Cmes'.2006';06-0/3 Amities CoaST Preliminl/l): PIal & Varia/lce (PENDING)',041806 -PC Report- <br /> Amities preliminm)' plat & Variancedoc Page 9 of 11 <br /> I <br /> I <br />