My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-27-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 05-27-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:48 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:06:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> needs of the project. I <br /> .. <br /> Section 3.11 Sources of Revenue. The costs outlined in Section 3.9 will be financed through the annual <br /> collection of tax increments. <br /> I <br /> Revenue June 26, 1989 Original Total including the I <br /> Budget May 27, 1997 <br /> Modification <br /> Tax Increments $14,196,966 $29,500,000 I <br /> Interest Earnings $500,000 <br /> Special Assessments I <br /> Other <br /> Total $14.196.966 $30.000.000 I <br /> Section 3.12 Estimated Original and Captured Tax Capacities. The tax capacity of all taxable property I <br /> in Tax Increment Financing District No.2, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of <br /> the State of Minnesota on January 2, 1989, is estimated to be $154,440 for the original tax capacity. The ~ <br /> captured tax capacity was $1,182,710. <br /> (As Modified May 27, 1997) <br /> At the time of completion of all phases, the original tax capacity is estimated to be $20,529 and captured I <br /> tax capacity is estimated to be $2,497,588, an increase of approximately $1,300,000 from the original <br /> tax increment plan. I <br /> Section 3.17 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. The estimated impact on other taxing I <br /> jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of Tax Inerement Financing <br /> District No.1. If the impact is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on other <br /> taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the financing would not have occurred without the assistance of I <br /> the City, Exhibit II-E reflects the estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No.2 if the "but for" <br /> test was not met. <br /> (As Modified May 27, 1997) I <br /> The County and School District previously been have notified of the fiscal implications of District No. I <br /> 2. The following impacts are for an additional $1,200,000 in captured tax capacity, as described above, <br /> based on current tax rates and values. The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes <br /> construction would have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District. If the <br /> construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding I <br /> the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the construction <br /> would not have occurred without the assistance of the City, tbe following is the estimated total impact -- <br /> Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.2 I11-3 <br /> I <br /> --- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.