Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ ~ ~ ~y I <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 14. 1997 4 <br /> I <br /> thc unique shape of the lot, placing this addition elsewhere on the lot would be difficult, as this .. <br /> lot contains only 2,450 square fect of buildable area, Also, given the agc of the existing <br /> structurc, staff was unable to find evidence of a variance being granted on the existing house, <br /> Therefore, if the City Council approves this variance, staff would recommend that the existing <br /> house/garage be including in that approval. However, staff would not be recommending a I <br /> blanket 15,foot side yard setback for this property, only for the existing house/garage and <br /> proposed addition, <br /> The Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance for a 15,foot side yard setback I <br /> variance for a proposed addition (including the existing house/garage) to match thc existing I <br /> house setback at 1459 Glenhill Road, subject to the condition of compliance with the plan, <br /> including the existing house/garage, as shown in Exhibits A, pages I of2 and 2 of2, <br /> Councilmember Hicks inquired if this was technically a 25-foot variance, Mr. Ringwald replied I <br /> that was the case, <br /> Mr. Wayne Brunn of Brunn Construction came forward to state that he was present if Council I <br /> had any questions for him. <br /> MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #97- I <br /> 10 with the Planning Commission recommendation as stated. The motion carried <br /> unanimously (5-0), tJ <br /> C-2. Planning Case #97-11, Jerome Stradinger, 1426 West County Road E, Variance <br /> Mr. Ringwald stated the applicant wished to construct an addition to an existing detached garage, I <br /> The existing garage has an existing side yard setback of 3 '3", and is 396 square feet in area, The <br /> applicant's addition would also have a side yard setback of3'3" and would be 576 square feet in I <br /> area, The applicant could construct a 332 square foot addition to the existing accessory structure, <br /> The applicant has stated that one larger structure would be more appropriate than two smaller I <br /> structures, <br /> The Plmming Commission recommended approval of the variance for a 3'3" setback variancc, I <br /> and a variance for an accessory structure not to exceed 972 square feet in size at 1426 West <br /> County Road E, subject to the condition that no othcr accessory buildings be constructed on this <br /> property, This condition was suggested by the applicant, and therefore the applicant is in I <br /> agreement with it. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if the proposed addition would be attached to the existing I <br /> garage, Mr. Ringwald stated that was the case, and showed an overhead slide of the proposed <br /> project. He stated the addition would be 24 x 24 feet, which would turn the accessory structure <br /> into one larger building, I <br /> .. <br /> I <br />