Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I' ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 11. 1997 ~ ~~~1 5 <br />~ Mayor Probst stated Council needs to consider very carefully the wording of this Resolution, and <br /> how it can be communicated to the County. The options he suggested are passing the Resolution <br /> and mailing it to the County, or presenting it in person to the Ramsey County Commissioners. <br /> He reiterated that the County does not share the opinion that the proposed route is unsafe, <br />I although there are at least five different points of crossing on a very busy road. He stated that <br /> although he realizes the need to communicate the City's concerns to the Commissioners, the City <br /> has passed previous resolutions and submitted them to the County with no tangible results. He <br />I further suggested in the "NOW THEREFORE" section of the Resolution, the word "some" be <br /> inserted in place of "further", as there has been no positive consideration at all of the City's <br /> viewpoint. <br />I Councilmember Keirn requested an update of the status of the turn lanes from Highway 96 onto <br />I Lexington Avenue. Mr. Fritsinger stated there will be a meeting with the County on September <br /> 22,d to discuss fire services issues, and this topic could also be discussed at that meeting. <br />I Mayor Probst stated the City is also facing difficulty in the placement of a City entrance sign, as <br /> Ramsey County is not willing to move their signal cabinet boxes. Although it is believed that <br /> signal boxes do not need to be placed on a certain corner of the intersection, the County does not <br />I wish to move them from the corner that the City intended for the entrance signage. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski stated her frustration that the County does not appear to be open to <br />.. listening to any of the City's concerns. She stated it is much easier to make these types of <br /> changes when the project is in the beginning stages, rather than when it is nearer to completion. <br /> She stated the traffic flow from 1-35W will be greatly increased, which will make this trail <br />I unsafe. She stated not only do the Commissioners need to receive the City's viewpoint, but the <br /> County's engineering staff also need to be aware of the City's concerns. <br />I Mayor Probst suggested inviting Commissioners Bennett and Wiessner to the next Council <br /> Worksession, and then take appropriate action on the proposed Resolution depending on the <br /> outcome of the discussions with the two Commissioners. He stated the alternative would be to <br />I act upon the Resolution at tonight's meeting. <br />I Councilmember Aplikowski stated she was inclined to act upon the Resolution at tonight's <br /> meeting, as the Resolution is all factual, gives good background, and states the City's concerns <br /> well. <br />I Mr. Fritsinger noted that the second "WHEREAS" on Page 2 of the Resolution deals with <br /> comments made at the July 30lh Highway 96 Task Force Meeting, and stated Mayor Probst and <br />I Councilmember Aplikowski should carefully review this section for correctness. He further <br /> stated that Council needs to be completely comfortable with the language in the 'THEREFORE" <br /> section. <br />I Councilmember Hicks inquired what the City's options are for the trail construction. Mr. <br />i' Fritsinger stated the Highway 96 reconstruction could face possible delays if the City objects. <br />I <br /> ---.---- <br />