Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 3, 2006 12 <br />Rob Davidson, 3900 Northwoods Drive #125, stated as to the parking he did not have . <br />any way to monitor the number of students in the building. He indicated this was the <br />number he had been working with. He agreed the site needed to contain all of the <br />parking, He stated he would prefer the addition of approval would require parking to be <br />tied to thc parking lot and not thc number of people in the building. He noted some of the <br />students could ride share, take puhlic transportation, or ride their bike. <br />Commissioner McClung stated this was a community with little public transportation and <br />so they had to assume most people would be driving their o""n vehicles. Mr. Davidson <br />stated all parking would need to be contained in the parking lot and he did not see how <br />they could monitor how many students were actually in thebpilding as long as all of the <br />parking was contained in the building lot. <br />Vice Chair Zimmennan stated in a situation sUGh'''as.Jhis, they needyd to have definite <br />answers with respect to parking and they".,peedcd to provide some:requirements for <br />parking. :>;:::11'-: <br /> ~ ',....>.,........ .. <br /> ,<..,.,...., nO <br /> n m.n n' <br /> p;.,."", " <br />Commissioncr Modcsctte noted there was alsoth~"9:Qj}iiy to' expand their parking spaces <br />by 20 ifnccded. Mr. Davidson stated thcrc was aj~8m~lJite a bit of parking within a short <br />distance of his building that wercnotzeing used aftef'~':RO,p.m and he would be willing <br />to talk to the surrounding building(jwile8~:t"q, see jf he cduldalTange a parking agreemcnt <br />with one of those owners. ";..",1./.,,,,';,,; <br /> ;';'~;.;;Y;'C'."C_ <br />Commissioner MeCIllng stated he wasno{ m with contacting surrounding . <br />property owners for additional parking. <br /> i' <br />Comm issioner Thompson stated she woulc!111j~c to see the proof of parking in the event it <br />was needed, She asked jf this should be ta13'1ed for further information, or make this as a <br />condition,)vlr. Lehnhoff responded thisG6uld go either way. <br />Mr. Davidson stated hc was not even sure he needed additional parking, but ifhe did, he <br />would get proof of parking. Commissioner Larson noted they had not seen any <br />assurances from the lessee that that was what their occupant load was going to 'be, He <br />stated he did not believe they knew enough about the tcnant coming in here and he would <br />SUPP011 faBling this matter. <br />Commissionerll.lezdieek stated if peak enrollment at the tenant's institution exceeded 80 <br />that Mr. Davidson could certify to the City that they had reached peak occupancy and <br />then when that peak enroI1ment was rcached, a proof of parking could be obtained at that <br />time. <br />Vice Chair Zimmennan stated they could make a condition that at this time they would <br />limit the studcnts to 80 and if the enroI1ment would exceed 80, they would need to obtain <br />proof of parking and subject to City review. <br />Vice Chair Zimmennan closed the public hearing at 9:26 p.m. . <br />