My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 06-07-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2006
>
PCP 06-07-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:58 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:07:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLA1'-<'NfNG COMMISSION - MAY 3, 2006 7 <br />. concerns as everyone else rcgarding the private driveway and the width of the driveway. <br /> She did not believe emergency vehicles would be able to aeccss one of the homes ifthere <br /> were ears parked in the driveway. She did not believe approving this was socially <br /> responsible for the City, She stated the rules were made for a reason, which was to <br /> eliminate these lypes of problems, She asked them to deny this request. She stated she <br /> was insulted that the property owner would take care of himself and not be concerned <br /> about the neighbors. She stated she was a real estate agent and it was common to have <br /> issues with shared property (i.e, dliveways). Shc requested her comments be part of the <br /> consideration. <br /> Vice Chair Zimmemnn closed the public hearing at 8:08.p.'tL <br /> ~ . . . -,'. ':" .. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if they allowed in the City Code a hammerhead in lieu of a <br /> cul-de-sac. Mr. Lehnhoffresponded it was not listd'las an option, so he would say no, <br /> Commissioner Larson noted the Fire Department dig not say if they approved or <br /> disapproved of this and generally the Fire Departmelltrequired a tum-around if it was <br /> over 150 feet. He asked if the Fire Department had commented on this. Mr. Lelmhoff <br /> responded there was no objection made by the Fire'l)epartment, but they also did not <br /> approve or disapprove this. <br /> ".....;:..;;,.;.;..;;... -.".:;- <br /> Commissioner Larson asked stafft~r,"CJrtesti(hllLfire Departrrtgnt make further comment. <br /> '<<:::<>L!iii:". .: <br />. <.. _:/._::)'>im;;1!,,:;;::jl!j_~~;_!,;:;::;:: <br /> Vice Chair ZimmennarLIlotcd if this W,!~"IL'shared'dijye, all trash containers would need <br /> to come out tothe public road for pick up and this was something they needed to <br /> / <br /> consider. He~tated rromhis own personal point of view because there was a lot of <br /> concem from theheighborhood and the Conlmissioners, he would like to see this tabled <br /> for fmiher information which would allow'itlle applicant to havc conversations with the <br /> neighbqrsj,l{jok at other options, andlook at the possibility of a City street with a cul-de- <br /> sac, <br /> Cormnissioner ThdJJ}pson stated one of her concems was from the perspective of the <br /> elevation changes arig,the drainage and how this would impact the wetlands. She noted <br /> one of the options they'had was the Rice Creek Watershed District approval. She askcd <br /> if thcycS~ld get thafinformation beforehand, She stated she was not comfortable <br /> approving~'tni~withQUt the Rice Creek Watershed District's comments. Mr. Lehnhoff <br /> stated they cOuldfequire this. <br /> Commissioner Thompson also expressed concem about the removal of trees and asked <br /> for the Rice Creek Watershed's comments on this also. <br /> Commissioner McClung stated he was concerned they would be setting a precedent and <br /> he would have difficulty approving this as submitted. <br /> Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner McClung to recommend <br />. denial ofthe subdivision preliminary plat based on the reasons that this would establish a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.