CCP 11-10-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

T..' ;-, ';~: T I h ....-. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 27. 1997 LJI ~ ... .J"-.'.':!i, 1 4 I A discussion ensued regarding square footage and the footprint of the proposed work, .. Councilmember Malone inquired ifthere were any setback issues. Mr, Ringwald stated no setbacks were provided for in the PUO, and thc only setbacks are between properties to assure adequate separation to minimize the chance of a fire spreading to an adjacent unit A utility I easement and public right-of-way also exists in the area. Councilmember Malone inquired what the actual variance was that is being requested. Mr. I Ringwald stated the variance would be to allow the enclosure of the two areas on the site plan, Councilmember Malone inquired ifthis would actually be an amendment to the site plan. Mr, I Ringwald stated that was correct Mr. Fritsinger stated since the property was originally approved by a PUD, this could also be I considered an amendment to the PUO because of the structure change, Councilmember Malone inquired if the process to amend a PUD is the same with regard to notice I and public hearing. Mr. Fritsinger answered affirmatively. Ms. Sharpe, applicant, stated they have nothing to add to staff s report. She explained this has I been a difficult process since there are no plans available from the original development so the property had to be surveyed to determine the location of the lot lines. MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #97- .J 21, Benjamin Sharpe, 1124 Benton Way, Variance (amendment to PUO) to allow the construction of a sunroom subject to construction in compliance with Exhibit I A ofstatTs report. The motion passed unanimously (4-0). 4. Case #97-22, David Monson & Mary Hirschboeck, 1175 Edgewater Avenue I West, Variance Mr. Ringwald stated the applicant is requesting approval of a side yard variance for an attached I garage and house addition, and a front yard setback variance for a deck. The applicant wishes to constmct a 2-car garage on the north side of the house to replace an existing one car tuck under I garage at the southeast corner. The applicant also wishes to construct a 16 x 12 foot addition to the west side of the home, consisting of a vestibule and deck. The applicant also wishes to construct a lOx 10 foot deck otIthe south side of the home. Mr. Ringwald stated this is another I lot where constmction of this sort could not be accomplished elsewhere on the lot. The lot is bisected by an extreme slope, The Planning Commission, at its October 1, 1997 meeting, recommended approval the variance for the garage and vestibule but denial of the variance for I the two decks. The applicant has submitted a revised exterior elevation of the home showing exterior elevations. Mayor Probst inquired if the applicant could build a deck on the east side of the house. Mr. I Ringwald stated they could, but Lake Josephine is on the west side of the house. .. I