Laserfiche WebLink
<br />--- --- -- <br /> L;,J_", -'. ."c, j I <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 27. 1997 8 <br />MOTION: Malone moved to table this item for up to 60 days on the grounds that the I <br /> .. <br /> response is different than what was approved previously and to allow the <br /> applicant to return with very specific plans for improving aesthetics with brick or <br /> other materials that will provide a permanent surface and/or is in line with the <br /> existing building and image as intended. I <br />Mr. Schraad asked for clarification of improving aesthetics, and if more brick specifically was <br />being requested. Councilmember Malone stated the materials being used would need to be I <br />upgraded. <br />Mr. Schraad asked if the precast would need to be covered up. Councilmember Malone stated he I <br />can't tell from the drawing what materials are being used where, but that something of better <br />quality than painted precast would need to be used. I <br />Mr. Schraad stated that North Heights has met with the Planning Commission and gotten their <br />approval, and requested clarification of the City Council's intent. Councilmember Malone I <br />inquired regarding the outcome of the architect meeting on-site. <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that when they met on-site they attempted to address the three directions I <br />given by the Planning Commission. It was felt that putting brick in the reveals was an acceptable <br />option based on the direction provided by the Planning Commission. <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired how much brick was in the reveals. Mr. Schraad replied .. <br />four inches of brick in three different locations. <br />Mayor Probst asked for a second to the motion on the table, and a vote. I <br /> Keirn seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-1, with Aplikowski opposing. I <br />Mayor Probst commented that the proposed reveals may not have much impact on this size of I <br />wall and suggested finding more compatibility with the rest of the building, He also requested <br />Staff research the minutes from the meetings in question. <br />C. Resolution #97-53, Authorizing the Commencement of Proceedings Under I <br /> Minnesota Statute 463.15, ET. SEQ. Relative to 1369 Forest Lane <br />Mr. Ringwald stated this property has extensive structural damage due to a fire. Building I <br />Inspector Scherbel has inspected this home but the building owner has not brought this building <br />into compliance under the deadlines. He requested the City Council find that 1369 Forest Lane I <br />is a dangerous and hazardous building and to authorize Staff and City Attorney Filla to <br />commence abatement of this property, He distributed pictures of the subject property and <br />reviewed staff s attempts with the property owner to gain compliance. The owner has been sent I <br />notice by Certified Mail of these proceedings. <br />Mayor Probst inquired regarding the insurer of this home. Mr. Ringwald stated there are some .. <br />concerns of arson, which are being investigated. <br /> I <br />