Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> The task force reviewed various fonts for the lettering to be provided with the sign, I <br /> including Helvetica bold \vhich is the approved City font. The task force discussed <br /> the aesthetics of these different fonts, based on that the City Council would be .. <br /> discussing this topic at its upcoming worksession. To this end, the task force <br /> recommends that the City consider using Windsor font on the entry way signage. <br /> The task force then reviewed various materials and colors for the retaining walls . <br /> which wOLtld support the entry way signs. The task force concluded that cut stone <br /> pieces of granite, which is a waste product of the manufacturing process. would look <br /> like a "dry-fit" limestone wall but with more quality for approximately the same . <br /> price. The task force concluded that the rainbow colored granite would be most <br /> aesthetically pleasing. The task force also suggested that at-grade lighting be <br /> provided behind the retaining walls to provide directional lighting at the sign face. . <br /> The task force recommends that the City pursue the mature evergreen landscaping <br /> on the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) to include behind the signs. I <br /> The task force also recommends the inclusion of annual planting beds with retaining <br /> walls to help visually define the entry signs. Lastly, the task force recommends . <br /> pursuing the assistance of Ramsey County for surplus dirt for berming at the <br /> Lexington Avenue sign, given Ramsey County's current road construction in the <br /> area. <br />5. REVIEW CONCEPT DESIGN FOR MEDIAN LANDSCAPING I <br /> Mr. Sanders provided a concept design for the median landscaping along Highway " <br /> 96. The concept groups the overstory landscaping that is proposed by Ramsey <br /> County for inclusion in the median. The concept would add accent ornamental trees <br /> at the ends of these groups with low level shrubs beneath the ornamental trees. I <br /> The task force discussed the relative advantages and disadvantages of a high (turf) <br /> and a low (native grasses) maintenance ground cover in the median. The provision . <br /> of a high maintenance ground cover would require underground irrigation <br /> (approximately $50,000) and weekly mowing. However, the high maintenance <br /> ground cover would provide for a very aesthetically pleasing median. The provision . <br /> of a low maintenance median would be more cost effective, but would provide for <br /> an unkept look to the median. The task force recommends that the City Council <br /> include the turf with underground irrigation the preferred ground cover for the . <br /> median. <br />6. FORlVIULA TE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL I <br /> CONSIDERATION <br /> The task force then summarized various findings that they had made since April of . <br /> 1997. The task force will be presenting these findings to the City Council on <br /> Mnnd~~., December 8, 1997. <br /> . <br /> .. <br /> . <br /> ---.- <br />