My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-24-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 11-24-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:14:07 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:07:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ---- <br /> IW rc~ 'F rs 1 I <br /> II <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 10. 1997 ~j lrJ ~ 12 <br /> Mr. R. Orlando Logelin, Minister of Administration at North Heights Lutheran Church, stated I <br /> -I <br /> they were asked by the City Council to research records to determine whether there was <br /> oversight on their or the City's part regarding the misunderstanding on the issue of brick and <br /> were also to present a proposal for a compromise to a total brick walL Mr. Logelin presented a <br /> detailed chronology of the history beginning with the Stage I Worship Center dating back to May I <br /> I, 1985. He stated that it was their conclusion that they were not required to use exclusive brick <br /> with any other future stages. Mr. Logelin explained their process for planning the expansion and <br /> desire to not use only one material but to break up that monotony by using additional materials I <br /> and to differentiate the activitv center from the sanctuarv. He indicated that another <br /> " - <br /> consideration was economics. Mr. Logelin stated these were the three reasons to consider a I <br /> combination of brick and broom finished (stucco) finished paneL <br /> He then reviewed the chronicling of Stage II activities for the expansion beginning in 1997. He I <br /> pointed out the words "Face of Existing Building - Brick is to match existing and other materials <br /> of addition are to match or be similar to existing building" which are indicated on two pages <br /> identified as Exhibit A, pages 7 and 8 of the plan. He noted that page 4, item 5 of that same I <br /> report has a paragraph entitled "Building. The exterior of the proposed building addition consists <br /> of face brick which will match the brick on the exisfing portion ot' the building. The two cupolas <br /> will match the prelinished standing seam metal roof that was used on the existing roof. The I <br /> building will be ti.tlly sprinklered." Mr. Logelin asserted that while this is not a false statement, <br /> it is an incomplete statement. Mr. Logelin continued his review of the past meeting minutes, <br /> actions taken, and their process to receive and award the project bid. e! <br /> Mr. Logelin stated he believes the applicant has made themselves clear in the progress of these <br /> drawings. He stated they believe there was a lack of communication between North Heights I <br /> Lutheran Church and City Staff but that their drawings have been very clear. <br /> Mr. Logelin stated they have never attempted to mislead the City and believe the documentation I <br /> shows it is clear that the activity center always included materials other than brick but should <br /> match existing materials, which they have done. He stated their requests are that if the I <br /> chronology is accurate as presented, then the building should be allowed to continue as originally <br /> approved. If the chronology is missing information to convince everyone the exterior materials <br /> should be other than stated in Exhibit A, pages 7 and 8, then they want to work with the City on I <br /> the revised plan, as presenfed, and request approval of that. He sfated if option 1 is not accepted <br /> but option 2 is approved, he will need to go back to his leadership to state the reasons why they <br /> cannot go ahead as originally approved and let them decide if they support the revised plan. If I <br /> so, it will be brought back to the CounciL <br /> Mayor Probst stated he does not take exception to the excerpts taken from various meeting I <br /> minutes but thinks there is a substantial difference in the chain of evenfs than, perhaps, what they <br /> or the architect is suggesting. He noted that the original documents on which approval was <br /> given, indicate everything will match brick or other materials, which he presumes are all of the I <br /> permanent materials, and does not include precast. He stated the expansion areas were <br /> considered not to be the permanent finishes on the building. Mayor Probst stated he cannot .. <br /> imagine presenting a project whereby it uses a significant amount of precast concrete and not <br /> identifying them on the preliminary plans. He stated he assumed "other materials" included the <br /> trim, flashing, etc. Mayor Probst stated that it defies fhe imagination to assume "other materials" I <br /> ------ ------- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.