My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-26-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
01-12-26-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2026 1:54:36 PM
Creation date
2/4/2026 1:51:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed options: <br />• Option #1 - Move forward with pump improvements as proposed. <br />o Estimated Total Cost = $185,000, which includes 10% construction contingency and <br />27% overhead. <br />o Applying the $56,000 RCWD cost -share, the remainder to determine funding for is <br />$129,000. <br />o Per previous scenarios, two are shown here, but Council may adjust however they see <br />fit. To align with the previous Council decisions, the 27% overhead is removed from <br />the estimate; therefore, the total to be split is $89,670. Council can include overhead if <br />they so choose. <br />■ Scenario #1, split 50150 between the City and the KLID. Only the construction <br />as -bid costs are split; the indirect and overhead costs were not included. <br />• City cost = $44,835 <br />• KLID cost = $44,835 <br />■ Scenario #2, 100% of the materials and construction costs (no indirect or <br />overhead costs included) levied to the property owners within the KLID. <br />• KLID cost = $89,670 <br />o Determine levy term (2 and 3 years have been used in the past). <br />Option #2 - Remove pump improvements from project scope, only address the erosion issue <br />on the slope near the pump per the Resolution (Attachment H). This would require <br />replacement of the retaining wall with a similar design to allow access for maintenance, as is <br />how it is operated today. Due to construction impacts, the control panel will need to be <br />relocated and likely replaced. <br />o This option would be only City cost at approximately $100,000 to $125,000. <br />o RCWD cost -share would not be utilized as it is specific for the pump improvements. <br />Public Works recommends moving forward with the proposed pump improvements, Option #1, <br />Council will need to choose which Scenario or create an alternate Scenario. The City benefits from <br />the improved water quality as the pump discharges ultimately to Lake Valentine, which is considered <br />an impaired water. These improvements can be used to show the City is implementing BMPs to <br />reduce pollutants and meet what is called the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) limits, a <br />requirement of the MS4 Permit. The proposed improvements will also simplify Public Works <br />operations and become compliant within the existing DNR Permit requirements related to consistent <br />monitoring Having the pump turn on and off automatically will ensure immediate response time to <br />the elevation of the lake level. Installation of the pump will be within a structure on top of the slope <br />rather than scaling the existing retaining wall to deploy a floating pump system into the lake. Having <br />the pump within the structure will prevent vandalism. <br />KLID consists of 46 lakefront property owners, the City of Arden Hills is not included in the district. <br />A map is provided on page 5 of Attachment A. <br />Through further research, staff found that the costs cannot be allocated as a uniform assessment to all <br />properties. Rather, it will consist of the levy ad valorem taxes on properties within the district. As <br />such, the amount will vary depending on the homeowner's market value, corresponding with the <br />actual bid price for the proposed project. <br />Budget Impact <br />A RCWD cost -share of $56,000 was awarded to Arden Hills. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.