Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — NOVEMBER 24, 2025 10 <br />Senior Planner Fransen reviewed the concept plans noting approximately 14.4 feet was parallel <br />to the shoreline on the new plans. <br />Councilmember Holden explained this meant 20% of the building structure was within the <br />OHWL. <br />Senior Planner Fransen reviewed a photo of the previous plans along with the new plans for the <br />property noting the Applicant states that there would not be an increase of the dwelling area within <br />the OHWL. <br />Councilmember Holden reported the previous basement was at 881 feet. She questioned if the <br />current home had a sump pump and if so, where was this water being pumped. She stated if the <br />applicant was going to build a crawl space, she would require a sump pump to be installed. <br />Senior Planner Fransen deferred this question to the applicant. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she was very concerned with how close the proposed bump out <br />on the home was to Lake Johanna Boulevard. She feared that rocks and debris in the winter time <br />from the snow plows would hit the home. <br />Councilmember Weber stated it was his interpretation that the Planning Commission believed it <br />was better to spread the variances over the larger parcel than on one small parcel. He indicated it <br />was his goal to get the house away from the water. He thanked the applicant for working to scale <br />the size of the house down, but he was of the opinion the house size was still too much given the <br />size of the lots. He believed the snow storage on this property would also be a concern. He <br />recommended this request go back to the Planning Commission. <br />Councilmember Monson commented she was having a hard time supporting the construction of a <br />home in the shore impact zone. She discussed how common it was for municipalities to be rigid <br />when it comes to shoreline setbacks. She recommended the new home follow the north line of the <br />shore impact zone. She suggested the applicant build on the existing footprint that would be <br />grandfathered in and not allow any new portion of the structure into the shore impact zone. She <br />understood this lot was small and she wanted to see the applicant be able to rebuild on this site. <br />However, she did not want to see the shoreline impacts expanded. She indicated she did not support <br />the proposed crawl space because this meant the applicant needed yet another variance. She noted <br />she could support this item going back to the Planning Commission, but questioned if there was <br />time for this. <br />Community Development Director Reilly stated he did not believe there would not be enough <br />time to turn this item around between meetings. <br />Senior Planner Fransen explained the initial 60 days have been extended to 120 days. She reported <br />the City would need written consent from the applicant to allow for an extended review period. She <br />indicated if the Council recommended the item be tabled for further review by the Planning <br />Commission staff would not be able to get this item to the Planning Commission in December, <br />which meant the item would have to be reviewed in January. <br />Mayor Grant asked how wide Ramsey County's right of way was. <br />