My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
01-12-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2026 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
2/4/2026 2:03:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — DECEMBER 8, 2025 7 <br />Councilmember Holden said development affects other lakes, too. This shouldn't be any <br />different than what we do at other lakes. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said there is a big volume difference between Karth Lake and Lake <br />Johanna. She said it's similar to a pond. The culvert by the businesses is a huge waterslide. She is <br />pleased to see Karth Lake got a B rating from the DNR. The Karth Lake Foundation has done a <br />lot of work. <br />Councilmember Weber asked if the businesses in that area are a part of the Karth Lake <br />Improvement District and if they would be leviable. <br />Staff said they are not. <br />Councilmember Weber said they are putting water directly into the lake from their lots. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed. He said the stormwater pond we <br />are proposing is Phase 2 of BMP 1. Phase 1 was fixing the erosion on the hillside. We cured the <br />erosion issue in Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be treating that. A lot of these improvements are doing <br />work for the commercial properties but the commercial properties didn't trigger it and it's <br />grandfathered in. Those properties pay the same stormwater utility that every other property pays. <br />Councilmember Monson wants to know more about why they're still a district. What <br />distinguishes their criteria for them to levy? She is interested to know why Staff is recommending <br />the City cover this cost vs. levying the district. Why is this project distinguishable? <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen doesn't have an answer for why they are an <br />improvement district. Historically there is a discussion the City Council can have if they want to <br />apply costs to this improvement district. There is nothing in the bylaws that outlines what should <br />be done. The City Attorney said any work done would benefit the properties on the lake. So there <br />is a legal avenue for the City to apply a levy. <br />Councilmember Weber said the statement that this is a benefit to those lake properties is the <br />same logic we use in assessing for streets. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked how many residents there are in the district. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said there are 40. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked what our percentage is, as a City. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we are one property. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked for confirmation that the contributing businesses don't pay any <br />of it. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said they wouldn't be levied but they would <br />be paying through the stormwater utility fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.