My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
01-12-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2026 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
2/4/2026 2:03:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — DECEMBER 8, 2025 9 <br />Councilmember Rousseau said there has been substantial turn over of the residents on that lake <br />in the last 12 or so years. If we did the levy, we would have to do it this year on top of the street <br />improvement. <br />Discussion ensued that the payments would be spread out over time and it wouldn't be a one time <br />payment. The City Council can specify the period of time. <br />Councilmember Weber said that $136,000 between 40 homes would be $3,400 each. <br />Councilmember Holden said the complicated part is the lake is only damaging half of the <br />properties when the lake is high. There were a lot of people who were angry and didn't want the <br />pump in the first place. It isn't as black and white as it seems. <br />Councilmember Monson asked what the timeline is. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said Council doesn't need to make a <br />decision tonight. We can continue the discussions with the Karth Lake District. The last time we <br />went through this process there was a Council Liaison who attended the Karth Lake Improvement <br />District meetings to have that discussion with them. <br />Mayor Grant asked how long it will take if we go back to the watershed district to request <br />additional funds. <br />Mr. Fisher said we are seeking assistance from the watershed from three different sources. There <br />is a stormwater management grant that would be applied to the shoreline stabilization and the <br />sump and SAFL Baffles. There is a separate one for the pond. Those are grant applications. <br />Typically we learn the outcomes around March. The $56,000 that was allocated was direct <br />appropriation funding through their budget, not a grant. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we have already begun the preliminary <br />application. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if the district is seeking a Council Liaison. If yes, she would <br />like to nominate Councilmember Weber. <br />Councilmember Weber asked if this would be just for this discussion. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said he is the Staff Liaison and they are <br />seeking a City Council Liaison. The meetings are held on an as needed basis. <br />Mayor Grant said the district decided they didn't want a liaison. Now they have this project and <br />maybe they do. <br />Councilmember Weber asked why there is a 62.5% increase in the cost. <br />Mr. Fisher said the original intent was to reuse as much of the existing equipment as possible. <br />The electrical cabinet and control panel were evaluated and it is recommended that we not reuse <br />that existing panel. The new panel will facilitate the operation of the new components we're <br />incorporating. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.