My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-01-25 JDA WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Minutes
>
2025
>
12-01-25 JDA WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2026 11:51:59 AM
Creation date
2/5/2026 11:51:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
gravel pit on the Arden Hills Army Training Site (AHATS) where it infiltrates back into the <br />ground. <br />Director Mitchell explained when the Army sold 427 acres of land to Ramsey County in 2013, <br />the property still included a variety of infrastructure, buildings, and equipment related to the <br />past uses of the site. Some of those remaining site attributes, such as rail lines, sewer lines, <br />buildings, and roads were demolished and removed by Ramsey County after acquisition. Other <br />minor ancillary items that still remain, such as power poles, will be removed or relocated as <br />necessary as part of the site preparation work. At the time of land transfer, it was understood <br />that Building 116 was a component of the necessary existing site infrastructure that was to <br />remain. Future development plans were expected to accommodate this infrastructure. <br />Larina DeWalt, Ramsey County, reviewed a slideshow, shared photos of Building 116, <br />commented on development considerations and asked for comments or question from the JDA. <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh asked if the building had to be moved for emissions purposes. Ms. <br />DeWalt reported there were no concerns raised by regulators or the Army that the building had <br />to be moved due to emissions. She indicated the emissions have been consistently below the <br />levels of health risk as indicated by the EPA and MPCA, along with the implementation of the <br />SGRS system. <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh inquired how often the emissions were tested. Ms. DeWalt <br />explained the Army was required to test the emissions twice a year. <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh questioned if testing would have to be conducted prior to the <br />construction of the spine road. Ms. DeWalt stated this would be done. She indicated the <br />MPCA, EPA and Army were all aware of the timeline and proposed schedules for the spine road <br />infrastructure project. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the potential of installing a heat pump as a potential <br />district-wide heating and cooling source for the Rice Creek Commons development. <br />Director Mitchell indicated the County would like to have an overall plan for the potential <br />district-wide heat source and the plans for Building 116 prior to approaching the Army. She <br />explained she was uncertain if the Army would allow the development to capture the energy if <br />Building 116 were moved. <br />Ms. DeWalt reviewed the cost and timeline for a feasibility study noting the cost was estimated <br />to be $50,000 to $250,000 depending on the depth of the study. She indicated a study of this <br />type would require multi-agency coordination and could delay the development of Rice Creek <br />Commons. She commented further on the complexity of putting a district wide energy system <br />in place and how numerous lines and wells would be impacted. She noted she has been <br />working with the Army for the past nine to twelve months on this infrastructure project to <br />determine what can and cannot be moved.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.